cankerp00p the legend of Server 1.Quote:
Originally Posted by cankerpOOp
I live on through his legacy in NA4!
Copycat.
Printable View
cankerp00p the legend of Server 1.Quote:
Originally Posted by cankerpOOp
I live on through his legacy in NA4!
Copycat.
yall really dont know sht.
i know cankerp00p..
yes he is the legend of s1.
and yes i play as him in na4..
thats what it means..
so get it right..dont know how many times i gotta say it.
cop?y?cat (kp-kt) InformalQuote:
Originally Posted by cankerpOOp
n.
One that closely imitates or mimics another.
v. cop?y?cat?ted, cop?y?cat?ting, cop?y?cats
v.intr.
To act as an imitator or mimic.
v.tr.
To imitate closely; mimic.
adj.
Closely imitating or following another
Server 1: The original sever
Cankerp00p on Server 1: The original Cankerp00p of Evony
CankerpOOp on NA4: A copycat of the Cankerp00p of S1.
You're also leeching off his name, and his reputation.
first of all, excellent post.. quite intriguing.. ninjas > virtually everything imo.
2nd.. lay offa the cankerp00p of servers 2 thru NA16. it's a tough job and somebody's gotta do it! I'm absolutely honored.. and he's got the cool icon/tag and everything.. yall should give him host already!
Get an original nameQuote:
Originally Posted by cankerpOOp
Cankerp00p = assassin
CankerpOOp = ninja
I figured it out now. :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Axer NZ
dude **** and **** im just saying =)
I'll second this!! lmao boleQuote:
Originally Posted by Boleslav
Oh my god. I'm probably wish later that I never got into this, but here it goes...
First of all, Deadliest Warrior is not an accurate source. Great show, but about 60% of their conclusions I have issues with. Also, if the 'assassins' are the Hassassins (see second point, below) then Assassin's Creed is not a valid source either. In fact, if you got any information regarding these two warrior types from a movie or video game, its probably wrong.
Second, I'm going to assume that by assassin you meant the Hassassins of the Middle East. Otherwise, it would be like comparing apples with food. Just wouldn't work.
Third, are we talking about in a one-on-one fight, or if the two groups fought a war against each other?
Ninja, aka Shinobi, were agents trained in stealth who would perform various functions including espionage, sabotage, and, on occasion, assassination of a high-value target. They were good fighters, but their main strength lay in stealth and trickery. The preferred to kill their target, if that was the mission, without actually fighting them. As for who the ninjas actually were, they were usually part of a mercenary clan or guild. There is a common belief that ninjas were originally anti-samurai revolutionary resistance fighters, which may or may not have some element of truth.
The Nizari, or 'Hassassins' as they were called by their enemies, were members of a rebel sub-branch of Shia Muslims. They established a number of independent city-states with the other Muslim kingdoms, and were known for their use of assassination and intimidation. They also used a series of sleeper cells who would infiltrate enemy territory and remain undercover. Although the Hassassins avoided killing innocent bystanders, they often killed the target in public to spread terror. Supposedly, they prefered to use daggers and didn't like poison, bows, etc. There is dispute about whether or not the word 'Hassassin' comes from their use of drugs, but its generally agreed that this was just propaganda started by their enemies and carried to Europe by Crusaders.
Both groups were incredibly secretive, and there arn't many records left. So most of what we know, or think we know, could just as easily be myth as it could fact. So its kind of difficult to compare the two since we don't actually have any solid info.
Personally, I vote ninja.
Based on what we do know rather then who is coolest, Hashashan would win. They are more numerous, better organized and the sleeper cell tactic is a tough one to beat.Quote:
Oh my god. I'm probably wish later that I never got into this, but here it goes...
First of all, Deadliest Warrior is not an accurate source. Great show, but about 60% of their conclusions I have issues with. Also, if the 'assassins' are the Hassassins (see second point, below) then Assassin's Creed is not a valid source either. In fact, if you got any information regarding these two warrior types from a movie or video game, its probably wrong.
Second, I'm going to assume that by assassin you meant the Hassassins of the Middle East. Otherwise, it would be like comparing apples with food. Just wouldn't work.
Third, are we talking about in a one-on-one fight, or if the two groups fought a war against each other?
Ninja, aka Shinobi, were agents trained in stealth who would perform various functions including espionage, sabotage, and, on occasion, assassination of a high-value target. They were good fighters, but their main strength lay in stealth and trickery. The preferred to kill their target, if that was the mission, without actually fighting them. As for who the ninjas actually were, they were usually part of a mercenary clan or guild. There is a common belief that ninjas were originally anti-samurai revolutionary resistance fighters, which may or may not have some element of truth.
The Nizari, or 'Hassassins' as they were called by their enemies, were members of a rebel sub-branch of Shia Muslims. They established a number of independent city-states with the other Muslim kingdoms, and were known for their use of assassination and intimidation. They also used a series of sleeper cells who would infiltrate enemy territory and remain undercover. Although the Hassassins avoided killing innocent bystanders, they often killed the target in public to spread terror. Supposedly, they prefered to use daggers and didn't like poison, bows, etc. There is dispute about whether or not the word 'Hassassin' comes from their use of drugs, but its generally agreed that this was just propaganda started by their enemies and carried to Europe by Crusaders.
Both groups were incredibly secretive, and there arn't many records left. So most of what we know, or think we know, could just as easily be myth as it could fact. So its kind of difficult to compare the two since we don't actually have any solid info.
Personally, I vote ninja.