Thank you, because, I dont want to spend money to farm.
and I just tried it with my last war horn, penicilin, and my hero with the excalibar 95k archers 5k scouts and more stuff.. and still lost ALL my archers.. omg..
Thank you, because, I dont want to spend money to farm.
and I just tried it with my last war horn, penicilin, and my hero with the excalibar 95k archers 5k scouts and more stuff.. and still lost ALL my archers.. omg..
its the same, you just take more losses
well it didnt work(lost all my 95k archers:duh: ) even with all the gears.. and the funniest thing is, when i conquered a level 10 yesterday, i won with less troops than that.. with the same hero.. what gives?
I think leadership plays a big role in how many troops a hero can command effectively, and I really think you should only be using lvl 100 hero's(which have 100 leadership) when attacking with 100k+ troops. That being said your'll nvr get the same results.
uses no items
92k archers
2k workers
2k war.
2k scout
2k ports
this setup I got from one of the guild on this site
I had some huge losses before I had lvl 100 hero's,and I stopped farming 10's b/c of that. But now I only attack 10's with lvl 100's and I see and avg. of maybe 9k archer losses(again it varies even if you always attack a low lvl hero it maybe that the hero happens to have a high att, or int stat, and you may take more or less losses b/c of that). Like I said the first few lvl 10's I attacked I had big losses like you, well, not 95k losses, think my biggest was like 37k, and when I saw that I thought lvl 10 farming was broken, but that was before I had a lvl 100 hero, and now I don't see those type of losses anymore. always check the hero before you hit the npc also, your gonna see much bigger losses if your fighting a high lvl hero, I'm sure you know this, but I just wanted to add that just incase.
I'll be writing a Guide to farm lv10s on Age II soon, me and my Alliance members can now farm them with less the 3k Archer losses after heal.
There are some other factors in AGE II a lot of people don't consider that will increase losses massive at start, but allow you when in place to farm them with less losses then was ever possible on age1
I've never seen someone shorthand 'transporters' down to 'ports' before.
I just call them carts.
scout the lv 10 npc befor u hit it keep scouting till u see a lv 10 hero or under . every time u scout the defending hero changes
it helps to have a hero of 180 for les loss
So sorry it took so much brainpower to figure out ports were transports, it be honest I think I'v nvr hrd anyone shorten transports down to carts, but if you used it, pretty sure I wouldn't care enough to write on a guild thread asking for a correction. God help anyone that you chat with on Twitter.
again sorry,
nvr = never = Not ever; on no occasion; at no time
hrd = heard = Past tense of hear
Hope they didn't hurt your head at all.
I use 90K archer, 3K scout, 3K warrior, 2K worker, 2K transports, with a lvl 100 hero with 224 atk and average losses of 7.3K archer for defending hero's up to level 20, with no war horn or anything else.
On a side note, I tried this same setup with my queen, who has 200 atk, but is only lvl 55, and lost everything, transports included.
Yes, as far as I can tell, hero level is the biggest factor. This is not to say that you would be successful with a lvl 100 politics hero, attack is still important, but at comparable attack levels, hero lvl/leadership is more important.
Also, my lvl 100 hero now has 245 attack,from 224, and losses dropped from 7.5K to 6K, just to show that attack does matter, just not as much as overall lvl
Wrong forum!!!!! Weeeee!!!!!
In my exp. the leadership is everything do to the troop numbers. I have used my Queen hero to attack a lvl10 NPC and lost around 35k in archers, however when I used one of my historic hero's who has a 150 leadership the loses on archers went down to only 9k.
Recently I have gotten him lvled up and gotten the archer loss down to an average of 5.5k...the mechanics are pretty different from age I.