me age2 sucks let age1 LIVE ON:flame::flame::flame:
me age2 sucks let age1 LIVE ON:flame::flame::flame:
Yay age I, uh oh ninno is here.
Age II isent too bad now that it has the attack option but I still prefer age I.
i think age2 is total crap all i see around forum now is crap about age2
Well i was in age 1 sense beginning, but age 2 (with the attack option) Makes it a bit funner, age 1 got very old, very quick.
I see where this thread is going. Both ages have there pros and cons learn to accept that there are 2 differnt versions.
most age2 peopl didn't play it before it came online though like these people who played evony in 08, now that's impressive.
I started playing evony in the mid late 08 and have been playing it since then, i tried age2 3 different times but i cant bring myself to get very far in the game.......i just like taking cities tooooooo much
i tried it a few times 2 dont like it
I tired it once, i didnt like it, i realised that within mins. Age one all the way for me im affraid. Which is annoying as i have seen a few good friends make the jump over and cant go join them. ::Sigh::
I agree Crappy. Just another A1 bashing A2 thread. Sure A2 has issues. Which is why you see people on here everyday trying to help make it better. All I ever hear bout Age 1 is. "Omg why are there 500 miles of npc between me and my enemy?!?!" Followed by "its a strategy". I am curious. Age 1 has been out since 08 and how many new units and new features and content have been added since then? The real tragedy is that in order to make A2 "better". The Devs just took a step back and turned on the A1 atk button. With out a modified game balancing change. When players can "farm" weaker players and get the equiv of level 5 npc cities for a cost of a level 1. Or "inactive" players that are FREE FARMING. But turn of refuge. Then comment in the forums. How do we lower the troop numbers cause we (devs) did not plan for this.
How bout we just agree that both A1 and A2 are different and provide different play styles then each other. Cause that is the only complaint we still here from A1 to A2. We can nuke cities. Well A2 can do that on the new servers. And A2 get Historic cities. So 99 percent of the complaints are just junk.
I started Age1 in late 09, i'm always late to the parties lol
Tried age2, didn't really like it so I stuck to age1. I think it's almost been a year for me now :eek:
I like how AgeI was made in 2009, but there may be people playing it since 2008 :rolleyes:
I am proud to say i started AgeI on the third day of Civony and been playing ever since.
I love finding people that think their npcs are keeping people away............they are so cluless.........when i send a 18 hr march from half way across the state to cap a lvl 10 npc, 1-5 miles away, in 30 secs and have enough troops following the attack to launch attack right when i capture it, they are so confused about what is happening.
I disagree, many, many vets from the old days still play and many more are still coming in learning it and becoming great.
I agree they should not make age2 more like age1, and visa versa. but again they are just testing this right now, so you can call it a tragedy........i feel a tragedy is what they are trying to do to age1 with the get people to have smaller armies.............yes yes i realize age1 is not as they intended it to be, but lets all be honest it has made one hell of a game, and should not be altered in a way that changes the essence of what it has become.
People that bash age2 have not really given it a chance...........i just prefer age1. i like the differences in both and they should not be merged closer and closer together, like it seems they are doing.
it seems like its been almost 2 years since it came out..................i claimed to play in 08...........havent really thought about it..............but i did start on s7, i have a horible memory about timelines
s7 started may 09 or something
Ive played both, age 1 server 5, age 2 beta and na7. I like both *shrug*.