I never said I could prove God existed or not.
I am contributing. I'm giving your equations the possibility of being wrong, which is important.
Unless you're stupid and assume your equation is correct from the beginning.
Printable View
actually, if it has anything to do with the topic, you can and will get a warning for false reporting.
But On-topic. it is really hard to model the expansion of the universe, as we do not fully understand it.
it's expansion could speed up due to factors we do not know. or slow down or even contract due to factors we do not know.
the most we can do, is make theorys based on the past, and what we do know.
So, right here I'll stop and say something very important to this topic.
anything said in this topic that is on-topic is speculation.
So with that said. based on what we do know of the universe, It will stop expanding. other than that, I'm not sure
If you're giving the possibility of my equations wrong and if you haven't been able to prove I'm incorrect, with math or with physics, then you aren't contributing.
You see, I'm not stupid. Any 16 year old who can figure out that type of math on his own is clearly smart. However, it takes a true idiot to disregard the fact that I acknowledge the holes in my theory. I know my equation isn't complete because I have yet to factor in the covertion of matter-> energy and energy-> matter through nuclear process.
Don't make assumptions. Especially if you haven't completely read my first post; that just proves my suspisions that you're an idiot.
This is a place for math, not stupidity.
But On-topic. it is really hard to model the expansion of the universe, as we do not fully understand it.
it's expansion could speed up due to factors we do not know. or slow down or even contract due to factors we do not know.
the most we can do, is make theorys based on the past, and what we do know.
So, right here I'll stop and say something very important to this topic.
anything said in this topic that is on-topic is speculation.
So with that said. based on what we do know of the universe, It will stop expanding. other than that, I'm not sure
But there is one more factor that plays a key part- dark matter. That is what makes this so difficult. My math in the first post only figures in the expansion and gradual decrease in expansion over time, and will eventually stop growing and halt if and only if no other factors play in. I'm glad you mentioned factors we don't know; that makes this theory even more interesting.
I don't need to prove you can be wrong with math or physics.
Actually, you're only proving you are one, repeatedly. It might not be in school smarts, but you're definitely stupid in what I'm doing.
But you're making assumptions. I'm allowed to make them too.
And I read it, I just disregarded it.
Have none of you questioned our origin? What created us? What created the things that created us? How did it begin? How did it end?
It is the quest for knowledge and self-discovery that makes physics great. It's like playing Evony. Does it appeal to your tastes? Does it spark an interest in your mind? I could say that Evony is non important and that it doesn't matter as long as you're having fun and alive. But that's not the case- for either of us. If you don't like physics then fine. If you disagree with physics then fine. If you aren't going to make positive contributions then there is a button that will ignore every one of my posts.
If you aren't going to be constructive then leave. Constructive means to support and help along- in this case, help me support my idea and make it better. Telling me I'm wrong for random and ill-though-out reasons is the opposite of that. Disregarding something important that admits a fault in what I've shown is ignorant. If you don't like it, leave. All you're doing is helping feed a fire that you want put out.
Can you prove that my figures are wrong? No...you can't. All you're doing is assume. Doing what you told me not to do? Really now. By the way, variables can't be in an error margin because they aren't constant numbers. Am I not a scientist? Sure I am. A scienist studies science. I'm studying science. Telling a 16 year old to be a kid is a bad move...the point in my life that will make or break my future and you want me to play with hotwheels.