Internet Restrictions - For or Against?

wikileaks was a blunder on the governmnet Network Security I agree with what Ron Paul has to say about wikileaks http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qpc_HXx5bjE

I personally don't approve of what Wikileaks is doing.
I support freedom of speech, but there is a reason the government keeps things, like many of the thousands of 'leaks' Julian has released, secret. These leaks endanger national security.
This will discourage informants that are vital for American military operations. It endangers the informants, which is mainly the discouraging factor.
It also exposes congressmen and the inner workings of our government to any and all eyes. Eyes that belong to terrorists, economists, military strategists, everybody.
So, as I said, I'm all for freedom of speech and that sort of thing, but you have to view this from a mature standpoint: we as citizens do not necessarily need to know all of those details. And that's why we don't, for the most part.
So.. I approve of restrictions on governmental information that we don't need to know.

I weep for those who think they are better off not knowing what their Government is doing to them or other people in their name.

"The price of freedom is eternal Vigillance."

--------------------------------Thomas Jefferson

There is no proof that the wikileaks have endangered anyone sure it has cost a great deal of Embarrasement for the U.S. Government. Is saving face really an excuse to sensor internet. The lose of that information was the governments own fault for ineffective cyber security.

"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."