Who is the Highest Ranked Forum Member...

Considering that people today can live a LOT more points than they would a year ago, I would think that our newer members would get their rep built up a whole lot faster than they could a year ago...

i dont think i understand how we are supposed to be evaluating here. could i get some clarification?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by imnothere

i dont think i understand how we are supposed to be evaluating here. could i get some clarification?

---

Bole wants to know who people feel have the highest rep to post count ratio.

Why does he want to know this? I dont know, maybe he's submitting it to a governmental power that will later kidnap this members to run experiments on.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jurnis

Considering that people today can live a LOT more points than they would a year ago, I would think that our newer members would get their rep built up a whole lot faster than they could a year ago...

---

True.

Perhaps a better yardstick would be how many times a member got repped per his/her number of posts?




Edit: I got repped 307 times so far. Certainly not enough to be even close to winning this. But I don't think I should be in the running anyway due to my long tenure as Mod.

Rep isn't a good determining factor of actual reputation.

I have been repped over 850 times.

Rather than looking for the highest rep-per-post, I'm curious about the lowest average rep per rep. By that, I mean rep(noun) per rep(verb). Take your total reputation and divide by the total amount of times you have been repped. My average is approximately 3.2 reputation per rep.

I wonder if that paragraph makes sense to anyone. I couldn't help but chuckle as I wrote "rep per rep."

Rota did you come up with a new language? because thats not english ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rota

I have been repped over 850 times.

Rather than looking for the highest rep-per-post, I'm curious about the lowest average rep per rep. By that, I mean rep(noun) per rep(verb). Take your total reputation and divide by the total amount of times you have been repped. My average is approximately 3.2 reputation per rep.

I wonder if that paragraph makes sense to anyone. I couldn't help but chuckle as I wrote "rep per rep."

---

Makes sense to me Rota...

Maybe retype it to average points per time repped.

@Bole - I tend to find myself repping colors more too.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Satan

Rep isn't a good determining factor of actual reputation.

---

True.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rota

I have been repped over 850 times.

Rather than looking for the highest rep-per-post, I'm curious about the lowest average rep per rep. By that, I mean rep(noun) per rep(verb). Take your total reputation and divide by the total amount of times you have been repped. My average is approximately 3.2 reputation per rep.

I wonder if that paragraph makes sense to anyone. I couldn't help but chuckle as I wrote "rep per rep."

---

Let's see... 1443 rep points over 307 times repped comes to... 4.7 average rep.

Which just shows I had a lot more from established members than newbs.

I must have a high rep per rep I guess...

457/68 = 6.7205882353 (enough decimals!)

That also factors in the red rep I received from Lazz one time for not fully reading the OP.