Originally Posted by
Jon 201
Once again, a merger I neither wanted nor expected has been imposed on me, at a time when it's hard to spend the extra time necessary to take advantage of the opportunity.:( (And I can't possibly be the only player who has less time available around holidays, rather than more.)
And though what's done is done, I have two suggestions. The first is a simple one, and entirely reasonable: If you're going to assign new names, it only seems fair to give us an ID change in the merger package. I would NEVER have chosen Jon_201. :rofl:
The second is also reasonable, imho, but I suppose that's debatable: How about making mergers optional? I realize it's a lot harder for the developers to do that, but, really ... I've no doubt that there are a lot of people who would be happy to be left behind.