So, wow. I asked for the info kemp said he had on tap, he said he hadn't compiled it yet, but he put up a sample anyway. I also don't quite get it, but I think you guys are getting way too bent out of shape over this.
1) Warriors build in ~3 seconds with a good hero, while towers build in 30ish seconds (I dont recall offhand but it sounds right).
2) You get 1 fortification "barracks" while you get unlimited (sorta) warrior barracks.
3) People are calcing the losses to be similar resource wise and stuff gets taken home, great.
Overall it's a net victory for kemp, so what's the problem? He could have crushed the towers with 9k archers, but at a higher archer loss. Are the pros outweighed by the cons? Iunno. Is it expandable to larger forces? Iunno. I'll think on it when I'm less tired, but it's certainly not something to drop your crazy hat over. Like him or dislike him, but slow your roll in this thread.

