In this epic struggle I want to know who would win? Be realistic, and take Age 2 historic city's into production, and its HH
Or age 1's Unbelievable armies!
Printable View
In this epic struggle I want to know who would win? Be realistic, and take Age 2 historic city's into production, and its HH
Or age 1's Unbelievable armies!
age 1. every good evony player knows age 2 is not cool. and you forgot that age 1 heroes have no limit....so we would pound your little HH heroes into the ground.
and because our friends have gazillions of res due to our botting, they could keep us happy confined in our little city.
Age 1 servers aren't the only ones afflicted with botting
And we'd still have your heroes.
AgeI, there is no argument. Any good player can hold of a massive player with tactics but will eventually be pounded into the ground due to the sheer troops the other player has. That is what this battle is like, AgeII has the strategems and therefore the tactics but AgeI has super hero's and basically as many troops as we want, AgeII can hold off for a while but AgeI is the better Age and is why you see a majority of top players on AgeI.
I believe that the instant troops of age 1 are pretty hard to beat.
age2 yeve no life bonuses from heroe and theres a particular defence i can think of that would hold off even 2k attack heroes if ye were stupid enough to use them. not that itd be even necessary to resort to that
im afraid yed just have to resort to trucing and holidaying, a luxury we dont have with our hcs as were a tougher breed :P
oh also wed draft all your instant troops and horrific res counts leaving them to starve and refuge
as an age 1 player with no age 2 exp other than perhaps the beta how can you say that? i think youll find a lot of "top" age 1 players left for age 2 as they found the age 1 game with the botting, all the alts and graphics etc outdated and unplayable.
your instant troops and level uncapped heroes are all that would allow you to stand a chance if you could get the res up to maintain them(good luck without your army of alts)
ive never been on 1 lol, i did enough research to realise its not for me, before i thought, pure pvp ill love that, but ive seen ppls war cities and the methods some use to maintain them, doesnt look like a game i want to get involved in
a luxury we dont have or need because were more hardcore :attack::attack::attack:
lol the epic debate.
I play age 2, but did play age 1 eons ago. like server 28-30 something.
I would have to say age 1 would win. If they could survive the first couple of weeks of some sort of combined server. Age two has the extra ammies and resources from visits that would give them such a head start. As soon as the age 1 players came out of BP they'd be wiped, but if given equal oppourtunity to grow say truce for a month or two and then the wars started. Age 1 would wipe age 2. Mainly over the hero deal, plus i believe "in general" (dont make an argument on this). In general I believe age 1 players are better at pvp. Heck its really all they have to do.
Hmm age2 is better fb bonuses are really nice xD
I like them both. Age 1 was fun but I prefer age 2 now.
im gunna say age ll cuz i dont have to worry bout my troops refuging.
Have to say Age 1 and I have played both. HH just don't cut it next to the insta att and pol heros. Wall defs can be changed instantly depending on what is being sent at you. Insta troops can be stacked in racks, no need to feed and your enemy hasn't a clue they are there. Plus, the only limit on the amount of these hero's you can hold is you working the backsides off them and how many lv10 FH you hold.
meh we still get 1k attack hero';s.. onl;y with a lvl 15 star set even hen there is not as much attack as Age1 in Age 2 it can be more interseting wih 12's.. ( well ti was at the start) But now everyone knows how to attack and take them with minimum losses.. so it is now Boring..
this is a tough question to answer. it depends on many factors including how much you are willing to coin on your account for certain items. Overall i would rate age 2 as more strategic and interesting due to a bunch of new features, including leadership,strategems, queens, star bonuses,somewhat higher medal droprates,no refuge,fb gifts and bonuses,colonizing, and historical cities. age 1 however is great for pvping and insta troops as well as leveling up heroes.
I'm an avid age 2 player, but to be honest age 1 would wreck us to bits if na1 merged with like lets say s140. No challenge for age 1.
I would bring my Age 3 account over and stomp on Age 1 and Age 2.
My Aether-1 account will kick your Age-3 accounts azz any time!
Age 1
Positives: Insta Troops/wall def etc/Stronger heroes/Bigger Warcities
Negatives: Massive botting/Refuge/Riots Harder to maintain.
Age 2
Positives: Historic Cities/Facebook/Easy to maintain/More Strategic playing.
Negatives: More Noobs/Smaller WarCities/Less PvP (For the first few months atleast)
Age 3
Positives: Me
Negatives: Talking trash to myself in World, Whispering myself, Only being able to host alliances, no competition for MEGAlantis, No green/blue/red flags, Server is 100% male and 100% Siphon (Oh wait, last part is a positive...), Doesn't get its own category on the forums,
AgeI , insta pults would wipe any HC, as a 2k attack hero with a pult wave would wreck havok all over your 20mil warriors.. And once the pults died just rebuild them and continue over and over :) And if you try and put food in a valley we'd just attack that valley and kill even more of the troops :)
AgeI is the better age, cause without ageI there would be no ageII :D
Age1 is the ugly big brother... Who wants to play a game where you're forced to farm daily in mass orelse you lose all your troops to refuge.
Who wants to play a game where you're biggest enemies can just truce their account or enter holiday mode to defend themselves.
I read alot here about Heros, Has it been forgotten that age2 heros have huge life bonuses? I bet none of you people bashing Age2 Have ever had a 15 start set HH Before..
I'd love to see your unlimited pults try to wipe any of my cities with your little standard life bonus's.
Not to mention the more advanced battle mechanics with target splitting, Age1 is still so unrealistic that an entire army will stop just to shoot one unit :dizzy:
How can anyone for a second even suggest age1 is anywhere near age2 :/
And btw, I've played age 1 for 18 months, and age 2 for 18 months, I could still go back to age1 and beat most their big players just like I did when i was there. :devil:
I also want to remind you all how age2 is the much better game for pvp, Not only do we have much more interesting battle mechanics but we also dont have 2000 npc's blocking every flat next to our cities, Our Adv Ports also dont have a cooldown for attacking.. 5 People can port to each of your cities at once and attack instantly.. And if they are HC's you cant truce them... Oh yeah Age1 is hardcore? Ya gotta be joking lmao
This is a no win question, it's all down to personal preference.
I tried AgeII in Beta and hated the blinding graphics, minature chat text, everyone and their dog spinning all their free amulets and the speed that Evony set Beta at for building etc...
Having said that, I never stayed long enough to give an opinion as to how it has elvolved.
I played AgeI, hated the time it took to upgrade anything and hated farming. In the early days it was fun, the people behind the game characters were great (friend or foe) we were all learning how to play and making friends. The che@ts were few are far between.
Then came the bots and alts.... AgeI RIP
Who would win? I honestly believe it would be down to who che@ts the most.
You're right it is down to personal preference, If you would like to play a pvp war game then Age2 is for you!
If you like a small amount of PvP, Lots of PvB (player vs bot) and HEAPS of PvE (player vs environment...Npc's) Then Age1 is your kinda game!!
BTW.. The age2 Beta sucked lol, I Didnt start playing till NA24 when they had attack servers :)
age 1 vs age 2 is like bf3 vs mw3
age 1 and bf3 would win hands down lol
there is just as many botts on age2 as age1 think about the atlantis on every older age2 server all the way back to na1 all the way up to na28 that i know of havent been on any newer age2 servers
its all about how you wanna play they both have their own sets of pros and cons, no one will win this if you play age1 its more about brute strength and knowing how to clear cities fast age2 is more of a build up since no insta troops cant build for 2 days and have a mega army. i play both and love each one for different reasons, those who are set on their game are going to argue any way but noone wins because everyone is different
and here ladies and gentlemen is a well argued and backed up and point ^^
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_gnm2C1B8vb...00/sarcasm.jpg
Simple answer: Age1
Why?
Well, Age1 is full of cool people, and Age2 full of noobs, f*s, and just straight uncool people. So with this factor playing in, Age2 is the scum of evony.