Thats more than enough troops.
Use your highest attack heros for the first few waves. Then it doesnt matter what lvl attack your heros have.
Printable View
Thats more than enough troops.
Use your highest attack heros for the first few waves. Then it doesnt matter what lvl attack your heros have.
Thanks, but are sending 20k warriors w/ the waves of archers even worth it? I know it would help reduce losses, but by how much?
The traps and logs regenerate so the warriors would soak them up and spare some archers
just curious if this was done post patch why is the D.T still called rock fall? all my attacks on lvl 6+, post patch it is no longer called rock fall
I am not sure who is feeding this story about warriors but they will only get your archers killed. Don't bother sending ANY warrior..All Archers with layering or Archers/ballistas with layering.
k i got 200k warr and 150k archers 15k ballista 372 battering rams and around 1-3k for layering troops (cavalry, worker, pike, cataphracts, scouts, swords)
i have 10 heroes with attks 90+
my highest heroe is 118 attk
my other high attk heroes are 105-110 attk
i have lvl 9 rally point and can use war ensign
i will most likely use penicilin ivory/war horn and corselet
Do i have enough to attk lvl 10 npc as it is right now or do i still need to train more archers? up to 250k?
My first wave of attack will consist of 90k archers 15k ballista 372 rams and 100-1000 layering
My secondary attacks will consist of 20k archers 25k warr
Is this too much to send? Any advice would be great!!
:D kingdivine
Because you will send LESS archers...L10 barb has 400K warriors for starters...May be people should actually look at their target first and not pass noob comments like, yeh trap..send warriors!!!
400K warriors.
1300 rockfalls...
3300 ATs.
.
.
.
get the picture...
No that's because archers are faster and so, they get in the traps BEFORE the warriors.