Just because he was the "king of pop" that doesn't give him the right to molest children. No matter how big he was that fact he was a pedophile is still relevant.
You say it has never been proven however i think the 20m+ he spent to pay off a kid in the 90's + the fact in his court case the 2 jurors that found him not guilty have since said he was guilty sorta does show that he was guilty.
Just think. These are all the public cases how many kids do you think he did molest and then payed them off without it ever getting out?

