I would like to know who thinks hero capture is a good aspect of the game, and who thinks it's LAME!
Printable View
I would like to know who thinks hero capture is a good aspect of the game, and who thinks it's LAME!
I think this poll is lame... plus should be in general discussion, not help.
I think it is pretty lame, the heroes are never worth the effort and I end up just letting them go. If they couldn't stop me, why keep them. There stats are usually garbage anyways.
Also, using the medals to pursude AND for promotion? I am not spending my hard earned medals on a hero I can get from an Inn (which is usually better) just so I can conquer a hero.
I don't think it needs to get removed, but no one uses it I imagine.
I've actually captured some pretty damned good heroes. Not from NPC's though - from other players who've lvled up and thought about where to put extra stats.
I've captured a damn good hero but most of the time they are junk. As far as it being realistic, absolutely. It was common that not only captured generals but troops would be used by the victor.
wasn't meant to be. Why the smeg does it matter... like mentioned in the real times, leaders would get captured... so what if you lost a hero... too bad so sad.
You know what i did when i lost my hero to a player? I took his damn city to rescue my female hero... level 1 as well.
Damn straight.
Hero capture is good, but I release 95% of the heroes I capture