PPP Efficiency Rating- What's Yours?
PPP [Prestige-Per-Player] Efficiency is a new ranking system I made up to predict the competitiveness of alliances, based on the #1 alliance's prestige.
I'd like some input to see if this is a good system or a bad system...
Please do the following:
1. Calculate your alliance's PPP:
Just divide the prestige of your alliance by the number of members. Round up or down if necessary. Example: Jaq?Swe's PPP is 238,650 (approximately)
2. Calculate same for your server's #1 alliance:
Divide the #1 alliance's prestige by the number of members it has. Round up or down if necessary. Example: Jaq?One's PPP is 812,849 (approximately)
3. Calculate PPP Efficiency Rating:
Divide your alliance's PPP by the #1 alliance's PPP to get the number. Round up or down to the hundredth place if necessary. Example: Jaq?Swe's PPP Efficiency Rating is approximately 0.29, as 238650/812849 is approximately 0.29
4. Post and vote on poll
Here's what I'd like a post in this thread to look like:
Your Alliance Name/Ranking/PPP
Server Number
#1 Alliance Name/PPP
Your Alliance's PPP Efficiency
Any comments...
Example:
Jaq?Swe/44/238650
Server 31
Jaq?One/812849
0.29
I wonder if this is good or bad
Use that info to vote on the poll (self-explanatory)
Comments:
1. Obviously, the #1 alliance will always have a PPP Efficiency Rating of 1
2. I don't know what's good or bad PPPER unless you provide feedback!
3. Please post AND vote on poll for best interpretation.
4. You don't have to calculate for you own alliance- any alliance is fine.
5. If you don't wanna calculate so much, check posts to see if your server's #1 alliance's PPP has already been calculated.
Thanks in advance... Let's see what this is good for!
:D
Once there are enough votes and feedback posts, I'll analyze this and see what's a good goal for alliances. Obviously, 1 or above has to be good.