The OTD Court

**Pieman** · 02-09-2010, 10:24 PM

((I have provided the option for lawyers to speak for themselves, problem solved

Dont worry guys, u can still stay xD))

And Zor.... that was a conversation between me and Arumen. I did not know how far Arumen's knowledge extended, I had no way of knowing.

Has the jury reached a verdict? It seems there is little to say left, and I think our side is done.

Please jury, do not speak with a bias. This is a court, not a spam fest. I am as serious as I can be here... the topic may be stupid, but the jury must reach a serious verdict.

**~~acer5200~~** · 02-09-2010, 10:50 PM

Your Honor, the jury has found the defendant GUILTY. Cake >>>>>> Pie.

Since the Pie side has provided no proof except tit for tat arguments and the Cake side has a slam dunk, bullet proof case, we the jury have declared them the winner.

EDIT: Fix'd

**Lord Arumen** · 02-09-2010, 10:51 PM

Sooooo, Cake wins?

**~~acer5200~~** · 02-09-2010, 10:51 PM

Originally Posted by Lord Arumen

Sooooo, Cake wins?

Yes, yes they do.

**Pieman** · 02-09-2010, 10:53 PM

Dont get ur hopes up, its only 2/5

**~~acer5200~~** · 02-09-2010, 10:59 PM

Originally Posted by Pieman

Dont get ur hopes up, its only 2/5

I count as 3 people and even if it is only 2/5, one more vote for cake, and you lose.

**DeSalvionjr** · 02-10-2010, 12:49 AM

Hello, I would like to sue myself. Where can I find a lawyer to represent me and myself?

**Yellow Submarine** · 02-10-2010, 01:07 AM

I, Yellow Submarine, agree with the verdict of acer5200.

While Pieman has made an argument against Arumen with his Cakeguy vs. Pieguy experiment, we the jury have no real way of knowing whether or not Pieman actually did feed Cakeguy entirely cake and Pieguy entirely pie.

Arumen, however, has provided evidence for his argument, and we have witnessed a third-party testimonial that supports the credibility of his evidence. We are therefore forced to conclude that Cake wins by default.