Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: A good idea or not?

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default A good idea or not?

    ...........
    Last edited by deadlysage; 03-04-2010 at 04:36 AM.

  2. #2

    Default

    The one issue that I see right off the bat is how much more depth in code writing it will take, and then the question will be how evony owners would be able to recoup thier investment compared to what money they are making with the game as is.

    In the end they are not aiming to make the game we want to play; they are making the game that is just enough to get us to pay. That is something they succeeded in doing.

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aramis View Post
    The one issue that I see right off the bat is how much more depth in code writing it will take, and then the question will be how evony owners would be able to recoup thier investment compared to what money they are making with the game as is.

    In the end they are not aiming to make the game we want to play; they are making the game that is just enough to get us to pay. That is something they succeeded in doing.
    You are right..
    However, I would like to see what they would do.

    You have a good point there..

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    England
    Posts
    92

    Default

    DS, good suggestions but with AgeII coming out of the box, I doubt anything will ever be done about the issues of AgeI

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rranyahh View Post
    DS, good suggestions but with AgeII coming out of the box, I doubt anything will ever be done about the issues of AgeI
    If I have a choice I prefer age 1 over age 2.
    Being a beta tester, well was I think they should keep the 2 separate, but that is just me.

    Another good point, I can only hope at this time...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    England
    Posts
    92

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deadlysage View Post
    If I have a choice I prefer age 1 over age 2.
    Being a beta tester, well was I think they should keep the 2 separate, but that is just me.

    Another good point, I can only hope at this time...
    AgeII has some good developments and elements of game play that look good but from what I saw (and I played for a week)....

    1. Stragems are going to be crutial and, as far as I can tell, they cost cents and never drop from the 'square'

    2. The colour scheme is abysmal

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rranyahh View Post
    AgeII has some good developments and elements of game play that look good but from what I saw (and I played for a week)....

    1. Stragems are going to be crutial and, as far as I can tell, they cost cents and never drop from the 'square'

    2. The colour scheme is abysmal
    Strategems is just another indept strategy to counter an attack with less troops, however you are right.. One might need to spend money to use one and or counter one. Age 2 will be more on who can spend the most will also attain the highest possible advantage. To be honest, there will be more exploit waiting to happen.

    I don't want to take anything away from AGE 2, I know it will be a great game in its own right, but I won't have the money to compete with those players who has. To do so, ill need to join a very organized Alliance or friends, sadly most of my friends left this game for other games like ps3 MAG.


    Thanks for all the positive comments.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Check your Reports
    Posts
    1,360

    Default

    Great idea.
    Now let us view the side-effects.

    Quit Evony (and Forums) 8/18/2010
    Periodically returns, but spends most of time on reddit.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •