Quote Originally Posted by Left9 View Post
Yeah... they need to stop caring about avidly enforcing "policy" and start creating a passable game.

Honestly, more money would be gained if they'd let some of the anal retentiveness on b0tting go, and instead focus efforts on perfecting their product.

(As an aside, all my buddies who were banned for b0tting spent over $100 on this game. I didn't b0t, and I spend nothing. You kept the wrong player, Evony hahah).
So, what you're saying is allow players to automate Evony because botters are the ones spending money? Seriously?

A few months ago before the first wave of suspensions an alliance was using a b.o.t. to send warrior spam at a city for two days straight. They stopped once Evony started suspending players for botting. Would it be fair to have spam attacks on your cities incoming 24 hours a day for days until the attacker ran out of troops? That's what allowing players to b.o.t. does. Of course, he might have been sending identical waves for two days straight non-stop by hand, but when they stopped immediately after the suspensions and went back to their attack style they'd used prior to that makes one wonder.

No, they kept the right players.