Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: Is this considered cheat? why? lay down your opinion please.

  1. #21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deadlysage View Post
    *snipped irrelevant "stuff"*

    Sometimes the simplest solution is the answer?
    Yes, sometimes the simplest solution is the best solution.


    Sometimes does not mean "all the time" which seems to be what you think the word means.


    In War one must limit its casualties to maximize gain.
    There is no point to a War won, when you lose 90% of your Army, now you are open for an attack.
    How does one lose 90% of their army capturing a level 10 NPC? Or are you basing the 90% loss on when you attempted to capture a level 10 NPC? o_O


    Please don't challenge my post then comment troll less please.

    You post, I simply reply.
    None of your posts that have been responses to mine have been you "simply replying" to mine.
    Last edited by Ashanta; 03-16-2010 at 07:47 PM.
    But....the eternal ray of sunshine REALLY wanted to see you, so I helped brighten your day by removing the city from around you! ^.^

  2. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ashanta View Post
    Yes, sometimes the simplest solution is the best solution.


    Sometimes does not mean "all the time" which seems to be what you think the word means.
    .
    I don't know what your difinition of simple and sometimes is but this is your reply to my illustration by using Alexander the Great in his vitcories.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ashanta View Post
    I'm sure he did since the only way to win a battle is to, you know, move your troops in and, you know, attack.


    How simple is it to intanst capture? I would like you to demonstrate one step by step if it was that simple.
    Like I said it requires precission but is still bypassable.

    I did mention that I can work around this new instant capture with excellent team work to utilize its function.

    For some apparent reason you assume that your target player will always be within 10, 20, 30 miles away, try 70, even 150 miles. That so obsurd, the closer your target the quicker you must process all the info for a precisely calcuated attack, for that instant capture to work, distance allow for more time and more accurate attack. It can be done at closer range, but that requires alot of mastery in camping.




    Quote Originally Posted by Ashanta View Post
    How does one lose 90% of their army capturing a level 10 NPC? Or are you basing the 90% loss on when you attempted to capture a level 10 NPC? o_O
    .

    What?

    The 90% loss is when you attack a player who might be garrison or might be equally good as the attacker. You simply don't just attack a player, you need to entise him to attack or work on other things to get him to attack you or attack his weaker city as a ploy and when the time is right you make that move.

    However, if the player is weak and you suspect he has no defense, then yes, move in and attack.

    Sure the element of surprise is in your favors, but you also need to consider who is his closest ally, that is not simply, it requires searching so you can anticipate for him to have garrison help.

    Although instant capture may apply for npc it does not apply to player's city. They take much longer to capture.

    Do you know how many top players teleport yet they don't attack? As I explain from my above note. You are in the enemies territory, surrdounded by possible equally s good or better than the lone attackers, it is far safer to be smart than to follishly attack as you just simply said, as a simply solution is to just simply attack.


    Now you probably going to ask or not but i am going to assummed anyways so ill just write it down.
    Why do that in the first place, because in many server enemies are more distance, and often good players teleport for vendettas or just to capture trophies to brag about. Simply put, because they can.


    Quote Originally Posted by Ashanta View Post
    None of your posts that have been responses to mine have been you "simply replying" to mine.
    You know, my friends here are laughing so hard and busting my chops for even responding to you, with your attemp to dodge and deny my reply is very humurous.

    Atleast I entertain them, it accounted for something.
    Last edited by deadlysage; 03-17-2010 at 12:26 AM.

  3. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deadlysage View Post

    You know, my friends here are laughing so hard and busting my chops for even responding to you, with your attemp to dodge and deny my reply is very humurous.

    Atleast I entertain them, it accounted for something.
    Learn to use the search function, and stop trolling.
    But....the eternal ray of sunshine REALLY wanted to see you, so I helped brighten your day by removing the city from around you! ^.^

  4. #24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ashanta View Post
    Learn to use the search function, and stop trolling.
    all i can say is

    Trolling in my own thread

    Dropping this is in order.

  5. #25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ashanta View Post
    Learn to use the search function, and stop trolling.
    just a suggestion:

    if you think someone is trolling, it's best not to bite his tasty worm

  6. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alzar View Post
    NO, this is not i know many people that do this and it is OK so yes you can do it.
    Alot of people just start new accounts and quicly build them up to knight, give them the city, let them upgrade two items to level 10 (usually converting farms to sawmills and cottages to barracks from a captured 10) then they repeat until 40 level 10 sawmills, and full up with level 10 barracks. Yeah its cheating, no I don't condone it, but it IS the truth as to how people are doing it. So the answer to the OP's question is yes and no, if they're trading the city to other alliance members using legitimate scripts, sure no problem, if you start new accounts for free scripts and do it that way its CHEATING.
    Quote Originally Posted by FoxyBunny View Post
    Naems, I actually took a whack at my monitor trying to kill that darn bug in your sig....lol

  7. #27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mulch View Post
    just a suggestion:

    if you think someone is trolling, it's best not to bite his tasty worm
    I am also taking this advise.






    Quote Originally Posted by zowza View Post
    Alot of people just start new accounts and quicly build them up to knight, give them the city, let them upgrade two items to level 10 (usually converting farms to sawmills and cottages to barracks from a captured 10) then they repeat until 40 level 10 sawmills, and full up with level 10 barracks. Yeah its cheating, no I don't condone it, but it IS the truth as to how people are doing it. So the answer to the OP's question is yes and no, if they're trading the city to other alliance members using legitimate scripts, sure no problem, if you start new accounts for free scripts and do it that way its CHEATING.

    I was avoiding getting to the new account part and hope it wouldn't go there.

    Last edited by deadlysage; 03-17-2010 at 09:55 PM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •