
Originally Posted by
Grimlorn
First of all 2 out of 20 is 10 percent. Secondly, I wasn't aware you were basing this all on personal experience and throwing out pertages of chance without documenting your personal hundreds and hundreds of valley hits. All the info like lvl, losses, prestige gained etc. This is misleading imo.
I do think there is a lot to medal farming that is unknown. But I've gotten the same drops as you have with farming the no losses way or just losing layers. Some days I would hit about 50 times and get 5 to 10 medals and then the next day I would hit 30 to 40 times and get like 1 medal and that was it. This happened a lot for me. Where I would have a good day then a bad day then a good day etc.
I do think there may be an increase to drops with more losses, but it might not be related to prestige. The more cities you have and higher your town hall lvls, the lower the prestige you get. So the medal drop rate would effectively drop as you went from knight to Furstin. I don't think this is the case. Otherwise people would have noticed the difference and there would be guides recommending you to stay around knight or baronet and do all the medal farming until you can hit Furstin.
Today I was using a civilian and lieutenant to hit a valley for resources. It was a lvl 9 forest. It just had swordsmen. I maybe hit it less than 10 times today probably closer to 5 and got 2 honor medals in it. I was just sending 25k archers. No losses. I've also hit several valleys on this same account and gotten nothing. I'd agree that I maybe get a medal 5 to 10 percent of the time with this account.
The other thing is I know for a fact that doing the capture and abandon method I can get medals 1 out of every 5 to 10 hits. It doesn't matter how long it's been since I've last hit it. I'm still going to get that medal.
Bookmarks