Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: freibndley allainces

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    waiting for server 144
    Posts
    154

    Default freibndley allainces

    i believe that allainces should be able to have one other alliance that they can transport or reinforce to such as a sister alliance say if there is a allaince called Death and they make a death2 they can be proper sister alliances and can help each other out more. As mostly its the smallers players that go to these alliances. Also u could include the allaince chat so that they both have the same alliance chat box.

    Any thoughts on this idea?...

  2. #2

    Default

    maybe easier to put som big players with tons of resources in charge of the sister alliance, it keeps chat more clear i think. And they always can exchange members form one to another. with your options, it will be more like a 200 member alliance, and a bit crowded i think.

  3. #3

    Default

    reinforce BUT with no relief station buff and NO dual alliance chat...that seems fair..... double the chances of spies and triple the confusion with dual chat

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Elita One View Post
    maybe easier to put some big players with tons of resources in charge of the sister alliance, it keeps chat more clear i think. And they always can exchange members form one to another. with your options, it will be more like a 200 member alliance, and a bit crowded i think.
    Most alliance groups shift members around from one to the other depending on what is needed at the time, and, if they are balanced properly, each sub-alliance should be self-sustaining resource and troop-wise.
    But....the eternal ray of sunshine REALLY wanted to see you, so I helped brighten your day by removing the city from around you! ^.^

  5. #5

    Default

    i'm in a 22 member war alliance, no troubles getting resources so i don't see the point really of an 200 member alliance.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Aussie
    Posts
    306

    Default

    Need resource, go looting. Works for me

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Elita One View Post
    i'm in a 22 member war alliance, no troubles getting resources so i don't see the point really of an 200 member alliance.
    Getting involved in a land war in Asia.
    But....the eternal ray of sunshine REALLY wanted to see you, so I helped brighten your day by removing the city from around you! ^.^

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Raiding Your Fridge
    Posts
    4,420

    Default

    The point of the 100 member limit is to prevent an alliance wide monopoly over a server.

    While yes an alliance can make various sister alliances, they are still restricted from truly being one whole force. Removing the limitations defeats the purpose of having a 100 member limit.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Here in front of the computer
    Posts
    16

    Default

    I was think about that also. There is another game I have played at one time. And in it if you were a friendly alliance then we could rein you and even send resources to you. I think that was the question that was asked. And yes I agree if we could rein other alliances that our friends. But limit to only 1 other ok maybe 2 other alliances. And only those on the friendly list that the host says is ok. All other friends are just that peace treatys or people you will help in battle. Just a thought.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    432

    Default

    would be great if it was limited to just one other weak alliance that you could help out. We all like to be able to help out the weaker guys. When you start out you are a very easy target and would be nice to have a big brother for support and advice
    GRAYSTOKE

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •