Quote Originally Posted by JPA32 View Post
I've always been more interesting in history around WWI and II events and leaders over most other history myself.

I tend to do that though. I'll just pop my thoughts on the subject into the discussion without realizing that I'm essentially just detailing what the last person just said with some extra personal opinions, theory's and thoughts.

Gotta love Stalin, sure he killed a few million people, but he was a great leader, and stopped the Nazi's. Until someone actually brings relevance to what Mao did, I decree that Stalin owns this thread.
WWII is a pretty interesting time. But I tend to prefer Greek and Roman history myself (Not nearly to the level Conrad does mind you, but well enough), or Feudal Europe even.

I'll do that alot, but I tend to say something all arrogant like "I'm going to expand on your thoughts here". It seems to irritate some people... I wonder why? lol

Stalin wins.



(While this seems to be in mockery of Obama's nobel peace prize, I believe in the context it is still relevant.)