"It" was referring to the aforementioned behaviour rather than David himself. I'm also aware that I should have used "who" instead of "that" which, as it is, also insinuates (if inconsistently) the latter example to be a thing. Not to mention the inconsistency of plural their and singular nose. But, I'm not particularly concerned with my grammatical precision at the moment. Regardless, however, I was apparently at least consistent in depersonalizing you both.
At any rate, I do think critiquing my post is a bit odd when you're leaving out letters and apostrophes in your own posts. While I'm not entirely familiar with Australian grammar, I'm willing to guess the correct contraction of "it is" is "it's" rather than "its" anywhere English is spoken. If I am correct, then I would heartily recommend proof-reading your own posts before advising others in grammar, lest you appear hypocritical yourself.
Lastly, the cost of having me as a guardian angel is quite simple: Following the forum rules. Having a courteous attitude helps as well, of course.
I've decided to take a hiatus from the game again. While I appreciate the support given to me by yourself and others, I think I need time off to become interested in the game again.
Bookmarks