A little scavenger hunt

[KOOPS95]

That's what you said.

Wait- SCREW YOU!

[Demapa]

I really love this kind of thread.
second, i was wondering if for a second hint, you could give two consecutive letters in the name of the cipher, so it would be easier to search through the humongous lists of ciphers to try.

[Axer NZ]

Well... that might be a problem. I don't know what its name is, or if it even has a name, I just made one up on the spot. It's a very simple process, but to give you a little help, it uses sequential numbers. That should be enough to figure it out.

[Asmo]

Well... that might be a problem. I don't know what its name is, or if it even has a name, I just made one up on the spot. It's a very simple process, but to give you a little help, it uses sequential numbers. That should be enough to figure it out.

is it like the soviet VIC cipher I think i got it but it doesnt make sense really the words AM i close or am doing the wrong numbers?

[Axer NZ]

is it like the soviet VIC cipher I think i got it but it doesnt make sense really the words AM i close or am doing the wrong numbers?

I honestly think you may be overthinking this... it's a very, very basic cipher with a single transposition based on sequentially increasing numbers.

Next time, I'll be sure to try something a little harder. It doesn't seem like anyone else is playing, so it should be fine.

[wpack10]

I know where its from....

PAINT!

[Axer NZ]

I know where its from....

PAINT!

Well, I couldn't find a well-angled image of the original, so I recreated it. It should be accurate enough for these purposes.

[imnothere]

i give up. i could do a riddle, but ciphers are beyond me apparently. and a random google image search was unfruitful.

[gottibabe1]

Maybe an easier clue that you probably don't have to decipher and you'll get a lot more players

[Axer NZ]

Yeah, I guess you're right. I'll put up another clue. Be warned, though, it's not as useful if nobody deciphers the first one. (Asmo, I'm looking at you...)