Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: [Age 2] Vote to Be able to take citys

  1. #1

    Default [Age 2] Vote to Be able to take citys

    Alot of players on age 2, Want to be able to take other peoples citys just like age 1. It takes the fun out of the game. That why alot of people still like age 1 better.

    Age 2 is alot better. Dont get me wrong there. But most of the fun was taking other peoples citys. I know there still alot of bugs in age 2. But they soon should be fixed. But I think if you were able to take citys in age 2. Then alot of people would come over.

    So if you think that they should bring back Taking Other People Citys. Then Post Yes. If not Post No

  2. #2

    Default

    Dont care no i dont...really
    Quote Originally Posted by davemata View Post
    I'm going to party like it's 1999.
    Server 188 - Fear

  3. #3

    Default

    No.

    I don't want them to change Age II. I'm happy in Age I and don't want to see all the players leave to join Age II.

    Keep Age II the way it is and keep all the FB kiddies over there and leave my Age I alone.

  4. #4

    Default

    i vote yes, the are so many inactive people, plus there isnt really a goal now, except get more and more prestige

  5. #5

    Default

    Don't care so much about capturing, but they could let us plunder at least. I haven't seen any way to use Privateering yet

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rasterbee View Post
    No.

    I don't want them to change Age II. I'm happy in Age I and don't want to see all the players leave to join Age II.

    Keep Age II the way it is and keep all the FB kiddies over there and leave my Age I alone.
    This sounds like a little boys QQ even with the "FB kiddies" comment Anyways..

    So if you think that they should bring back Taking Other People Citys. Then Post Yes. If not Post No


    I VOTE YES !

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Derby, United Kingdom.
    Posts
    7,865

    Default

    Age 2 is boring without being able to conquer cities. Going into end game there is no incentive to waste 200k archers just to colonise a city. I'm wondering when/if the suggestions made in on-topic will be implemented because i'm losing my will to play age 2 any more...

    Quote Originally Posted by Alusair View Post
    If you don't care enough to make yourself understandable, don't be surprised if others don't care enough to try to figure out what you're trying to tell them.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezekian View Post
    This sounds like a little boys QQ even with the "FB kiddies" comment
    Uh....wut? What am I crying about? How I like Age I?

    And, again...I vote No. I don't want them to allow you to cap cities in Age II.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Danoman View Post
    Don't care so much about capturing, but they could let us plunder at least. I haven't seen any way to use Privateering yet
    What's the point of having warehouses, period, since you can't plunder someone.... well... not that warehouses serve any purpose anyway once you reach "warlord" status in Age 1... but the whole concept of warehouses, the stockpile technology, and privateering (not to mention the strategms involving warehouses) seems to be pointless in Age 2 since you can't plunder people, period.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    SPARTA
    Posts
    154

    Default

    i vote no
    age1 is age 1
    age 2 is different
    but i do prefer the graphics on age2 and the hero gear
    the rest i prefer age1
    colonising is a bum at the best of times
    ()xxxxxxxxx[]ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ>

    Many thanks to Ravenwings for the Sig picture.
    [Whisper]<12:32>From [TBpower] : i happened to be the first oone in grade to hit puberty

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •