Rank the world's superpowers

[Satan]

Powerwolf, I am of the opinion that no economic/industrial power nation will use nuclear bombs in warfare. That being said, nukes are still dangerous, but when/if one is used it will be by militia/terrorist organization without ties to any individual nation. Major world powers view nukes as deterrents, not actual offensive weapons.

Staring a nuclear war means the downfall of society. Everybody's got nukes now.

I think of any one country got desperate enough, they would use the nukes. Or if a radical leader comes into play of let's just say Russia, we could see Nukes detonating because of governmental orders.

[powerwolf]

Powerwolf, I am of the opinion that no economic/industrial power nation will use nuclear bombs in warfare. That being said, nukes are still dangerous, but when/if one is used it will be by militia/terrorist organization without ties to any individual nation. Major world powers view nukes as deterrents, not actual offensive weapons.

Staring a nuclear war means the downfall of society. Everybody's got nukes now.

i put it in order of how many that are active not all together..

but lets put it this way
1)usa main power of the world
2)britain(since britain can still kick the rest of europe ass as they kep running to us for help with money and that)
3)europe
4)china
5)japan
6)rest of the world

[Satan]

i put it in order of how many that are active not all together..

but lets put it this way
1)usa main power of the world
2)britain(since britain can still kick the rest of europe ass as they kep running to us for help with money and that)
3)europe
4)china
5)japan
6)rest of the world

Japan? They can't even have a military under the treaty they signed with America after the Pacific War.

[rasterbee]

i put it in order of how many that are active not all together..

but lets put it this way
1)usa main power of the world
2)britain(since britain can still kick the rest of europe ass as they kep running to us for help with money and that)

Russia has a LOT more nukes than UK, wolfy.

[Holeypaladin]

UK used to be number 1, back in the 19th century.

However, they're no longer even number 1 in Europe, much less number 2 in the world... truth is, Germany has been more powerful than UK since it re-united.

But any individual European country is weak in comparison to the top single countries.

[powerwolf]

I think of any one country got desperate enough, they would use the nukes. Or if a radical leader comes into play of let's just say Russia, we could see Nukes detonating because of governmental orders.

if i was PM of britain i would nuke afgan that way i know i would have hit bin larden

[Satan]

UK used to be number 1, back in the 19th century.

However, they're no longer even number 1 in Europe, much less number 2 in the world... truth is, Germany has been more powerful than UK since it re-united.

But any individual European country is weak in comparison to the top single countries.

Again, Germany isn't allowed to have a strong military under the treaty the signed with the Allies.

[rasterbee]

1. China
2. U.S.A.
3. Europe
4. Russia
5. India
5. Brazil

[Satan]

1. China
2. U.S.A.
3. Europe
4. Russia
5. India
5. Brazil

If China went to war with the U.S, who would win?

[Holeypaladin]

http://www.globalfirepower.com/count...try_id=Germany

That's hardly a weak military...

But I'm going to revise my statement and say that Germany has the strongest Army in western Europe, but their navy is weaker in comparison with Britain.