
Originally Posted by
rtaxx
yes, I agreed with you that its "inverse".... I objected to your statement that it was "inversely proportional".... If I am agreeing that it is an "inverse" relationship but pointing out that its NOT "inversely proportional" isnt it safe to assume the error lies somewhere other than the with the word "inverse"? (hint:non-linear)
of COURSE it matters if its linear or not..... the "decrease" is going from 100% to 0%, so if the "increase" were also linear, you would have the possibility of "negative" build times..... saying it would be "inversely proportional" is incorrect, though the relationship is inverse...
Also, saying it "will always be inversely proportional" isn't true either, though THAT explanation may twist your melon
Bookmarks