Quote Originally Posted by rtaxx View Post
yes, I agreed with you that its "inverse".... I objected to your statement that it was "inversely proportional".... If I am agreeing that it is an "inverse" relationship but pointing out that its NOT "inversely proportional" isnt it safe to assume the error lies somewhere other than the with the word "inverse"? (hint:non-linear)

of COURSE it matters if its linear or not..... the "decrease" is going from 100% to 0%, so if the "increase" were also linear, you would have the possibility of "negative" build times..... saying it would be "inversely proportional" is incorrect, though the relationship is inverse...

Also, saying it "will always be inversely proportional" isn't true either, though THAT explanation may twist your melon
The only way to have "negative" build times would be to somehow figure out how to build it faster than infinity. You figure out a build speed faster than infinity and I will concede that.

The definition of inversly proportional is when the product of one variable is directly proportional with the reciprocal of the other.

In the speed, build time equation the speed is always directly proportional with the reciprocal of the build time.