Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 44

Thread: 4 New Suggestions For Alliances.

  1. Default

    sorry to be the negative person...
    the map, no no no..
    what if someone came in to be vice host, but was actually a well disguised spy???

    Week 9 voting and Week 10 entries.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rota View Post
    I'm not sure if there was a counterpoint in there. But, if it will make you happy, then I yield the dispute to put an end to this tangent. You win.
    I won!
    Enter the Void - My Video Gaming Forum

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In Tha Forumz
    Posts
    603

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LordMac123 View Post
    sorry to be the negative person...
    the map, no no no..
    what if someone came in to be vice host, but was actually a well disguised spy???
    Whole heartedly agree!

  3. #33

    Default

    Sorry I have to respond to the above 2 posts. OMG why oh why would you bring someone into that sort of position without actually knowing and playing with them for a while. For me as a Host, my VH's, Presbs and Officers are all trusted players I have come to know and trust in helping of running the alliance because it takes up so much dang time and, some of us have real lives to live as well. To run a successful alliance at the moment is very very difficult and hence why Host's get burnt out but I WOULD NEVER appoint someone into a position of power without actually knowing and trusting them.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    turn arround
    Posts
    90

    Default

    idea 1: It kinda makes the game a bit more like which ever alliance has the most gold will win. It freaks me out a little.

    idea 2: There is already an evolliance interactive map, and all the stuff you added to it would be too helpful for spies. Ex: a spy for an alliance says look he is getting attacked by this alliance. Lets attack his other city while he is vulnerable.

    idea 3: I like the part about the infinity walls and stuff, but it seams more like colonizing members than joining an alliance. If this was put into affect I would want no alliance.

    idea 4: This might be a good idea. It will be interesting to see how it would work.

  5. #35

    Default

    Good ideas Not sure about the fist one
    Quote Originally Posted by davemata View Post
    I'm going to party like it's 1999.
    Server 188 - Fear

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    IN NATIONAL SERVICE
    Posts
    154

    Default

    I love dose ideas mentioned out, but juz one thing, bring dem to Age II not Age I..
    Cause Evony juz wanna port everyone to play AGE II nowadays..


    THX BOLESLAV FOR SIGGY

    | Enchik | Founder of ROE | Server NA 13 | Sig Shop |

  7. #37

    Thumbs up

    WARNING LONG POST


    Quote Originally Posted by jorbaud View Post
    I agree with this. It would really help get rid of some gold.

    I like the part where there is a diplomacy officer. The part where you can see coordinates should only be for vice-hosts and the host, not for presbyter.

    I do not like this. You should capture a historic city if you want it. Also, what happens if there is more alliances then capital cities?


    I do not like this idea either. If someone in the alliance is attack somebody they could be forced to stop if the alliance is put into truce. If you want to truce do it yourself.
    One if your a big alliance you should be able to hold a city because it would be all your members reinforcing it. Also we can limit each alliance to 3 Capital Cities so they would only go for the big alliance's rather then the little one's who may quit because of the tax.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Toad View Post
    If what you're saying is true, then alliances will get bored with what they can do at the moment. An example is me. Having a huge city where you can manage your alliance would be great. Meh with the group messages and diplomacy. The map would make being a Presbyter much more fun. We need to give more powers to hosts, otherwise they will leave Evony because of boredom. It's an ALLIANCE. You join for protection. Currently everyone has to find out if their enemies are offline. If this power came into use, everyone would have more power, not just 1. So I don't really get your point about strategy.

    P.S. I fixed your spelling errors in the quote
    Their is a map like this on evoalliance.com I just added a few feature's And I like them;

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Toad View Post
    For convenience, I labeled your arguments with numbers.

    1. I do too, although it seems to be the only idea you would like not to change. Why is that?

    2. If so, what's the point of being a Presbyter if you have active Vice-Hosts and an active Host? There's nothing to do. This would create some fun. Also, I think there should be varying levels of accessibility the Host can set.

    3. If so, what would be the point of having a Top Ten alliance with 100 members? Bragging rights? If you have 100 members and are the #1 alliance you should get a reward. Also I didn't say that the alliances would take up historicals. New ones would be created.

    4. The truce should stop all attacks made AFTER the truce is applied. Incoming attacks should still hit.

    Agreed. 4. and I like 3.

    If a vice-host is up late at night and somebody attacks another member, the vice host should be able to see when the attack will hit them and the ability to send a report to the player saying something under the lines of:

    (insert position here) (insert name here) saw an attack to (insert city name here) and wanted to notify you that it will hit at (insert time here).

    If you're a Vice Host, there should be other things in place to keep you from quitting and starting your own, since the Host would be upset that he/she promoted you then you left.
    Not if your a loyal VH.

    Quote Originally Posted by dylo48 View Post
    Suggestion 3 is good but what about 1 man alliances?
    Quote Originally Posted by 0Spawn0 View Post
    That would be amazing for hosts. Not sure about being able to see reports but to see everyone locations there resource count as well as troop count would make it a lot easier to manage alliances, as a host my self i have to request this information and updating my own excel sheets it time consuming.
    Limit it that once an alliance has 25+ members they get their capital city.

    Quote Originally Posted by LordMac123 View Post
    sorry to be the negative person...
    the map, no no no..
    what if someone came in to be vice host, but was actually a well disguised spy???
    The host would be able to see what's in their city and have their coords. The host would act if people start lossing cities with that VH in position. The host should be able to trust the VH entirely.

  8. #38

    Default

    I like number two the others i cant say the same about..

  9. #39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SS6 Perses View Post
    I like number two the others i cant say the same about..
    Em sorry but I like them all.

  10. #40

    Default

    Last edited by LordPoweer; Today at 07:37 PM. Reason: Added new content. (Capitol Cities Section).

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •