Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 39 of 39

Thread: Age1 or Age2

  1. #31

    Default

    after recently playing age 2 and playing age 1 for ages now i can happily say that age 2 is completely pointless..... a war game that doesnt allow you to attack other players, iv heard it all now,
    age 2's over complicated graphics and the whole facebook using thing totally rules me out.....

    age 1 rocks

    age 2 is for amatures
    Last edited by Achillies101; 08-05-2010 at 07:58 AM.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    In you Town- Whoops sorry Conquered ya town mate.
    Posts
    1,529

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Achillies101 View Post
    after recently playing age 2 and playing age 1 for ages now i can happily say that age 2 is completely pointless..... a war game that doesnt allow you to attack other players, iv heard it all now,
    age 2's over complicated graphics and the whole facebook using thing totally rules me out.....

    age 1 rocks

    age 2 is for amatures
    You completely off mate, with the new attack features AgeII is pretty much better then Age 1 in every way, also the Historic cities give new challenges for the best of players.

    Age2 all the way now, before long everyone will come to age2.

    Spawn- AgeII Na13 - Massacre Founder
    Every one of your enemies has a weakness, you only have to find it, Unless you find your self facing me, were it shall be your weakness that leads to your demise - Spawn.

  3. #33

    Default

    well i signed up to NA22 and it doesnt show an attack button.... and as for the whole historic city thing whats all that about? from what iv learned you have to use massive amounts of troops to capture a HC(even more than an npc level 10) , with which you can control certain aspects of players cities, this is a very stupid idea....

    players that spend big bucks will rule this feature leaving people who dont pay and i mean literally dont spend a penny hopeless and without a way of creating there own reputation

    if there is an attack button being introduced it will be like giving a drunk 10 year old a loaded gun in the sense that nobody will know what they are doing because they are used to only building and probably reinforcing those stupid historically things......

    get on age 1 were big spenders dont always come out on top and fight and play properly thats what i say....

    evony probably know that age 2 style of play will attract big spending

    age 1 rules

  4. #34

    Default

    TCMNE wrote


    "The ability to cut upkeep 50%, and for money spenders 100%, allows most players to be able to have several millions of each troop type"

    evony what the hell are you guys doing!!!

    a 50% troop advantage through facebook plus 25% extra resources including food for troops plus everyother advantage monet spenders have leaves non spenders useless on age 2....

    as players can see evonys only interests in age 2 is money money money, fair enough they need to make a living but there is certain ways of doing things. ITS NOT FAIR

    EVONY YOU MIGHT ASWELL CALL AGE 2 THE MONEY ONLY SERVER!!!!

    NO FARMING NO ATTACKING NO POINT! AGE 2 IS A SERVER MADE FOR LAZY RETARDS THAT CANT HACK PLAYING AGE 1 BECAUSE THEY ARE CRAP PLAYERS
    Last edited by Achillies101; 08-05-2010 at 09:52 AM.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    In you Town- Whoops sorry Conquered ya town mate.
    Posts
    1,529

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Achillies101 View Post
    TCMNE wrote


    "The ability to cut upkeep 50%, and for money spenders 100%, allows most players to be able to have several millions of each troop type"

    evony what the hell are you guys doing!!!

    a 50% troop advantage through facebook plus 25% extra resources including food for troops plus everyother advantage monet spenders have leaves non spenders useless on age 2....

    as players can see evonys only interests in age 2 is money money money, fair enough they need to make a living but there is certain ways of doing things. ITS NOT FAIR

    EVONY YOU MIGHT ASWELL CALL AGE 2 THE MONEY ONLY SERVER!!!!

    NO FARMING NO ATTACKING NO POINT! AGE 2 IS A SERVER MADE FOR LAZY RETARDS THAT CANT HACK PLAYING AGE 1 BECAUSE THEY ARE CRAP PLAYERS
    Seriously man just don't bother posting if you don't even understand age2 then you don't have a proper view on the subject play for a month then talk about it.

    Spawn- AgeII Na13 - Massacre Founder
    Every one of your enemies has a weakness, you only have to find it, Unless you find your self facing me, were it shall be your weakness that leads to your demise - Spawn.

  6. #36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 0Spawn0 View Post
    Seriously man just don't bother posting if you don't even understand age2 then you don't have a proper view on the subject play for a month then talk about it.
    Here you go Spawn. Maybe this is a little better explained.

    The addition of the attack button is a big step forward but there are still things about Age 2 that are concerning.

    1. Facebook - I have an issue that joining another network so that you can earn rewards. I find it totally unbalanced that people who actually play the game receive less rewards than those who go on Facebook and send gifts to their friends.

    2. The imbalance between spenders and non spenders - I will even include spenders who are on a budget too. This can be seen with Heroes and Hero gear. In Age 1 you could compete with someone who spent a lot of money by putting a lot of time. This kept the game in balance and I think a lot of people felt that it was a fair trade off. That has been completely eliminated in Age 2. The only way to stay competitive is to spend money, and a lot of it too.

    3. Hero caps. - I see this as a huge problem once end game happens. The game will be too slow. When the only thing left to do is fight, you want to have faster build speeds. In Age 1 instant troops made the game unbalanced. Evony swung too far in the opposite direction to stop this.

    So even though there is an attack button, I feel that there are other problems to be addressed before I consider Age 2 to be better than Age 1.

  7. #37

    Default

    Only thing that sucks about Age I is the medal rarity they introduced.

    here's one thread on it: http://bbs.evony.com/showthread.php?t=121085

    I don't agree with any of the posts there really.

    Sure. People are whining about rarity to much, that's for sure, it achieves nothing. It seems alot of these people favor the old system and seem to expect medals galore, which is silly.

    However, the notion that the new medal rarity "creates a challenge" is very ridiculous. You really believe that the new medal rarity is merely a challenge to be overcome? That's insane and I really doubt you could honestly say that and keep a straight face. I myself have raided literally hundreds of valleys in several different ways with endless combinations and variables and I have not found a single medal yet. Nor have I heard of anyone finding many (if any). I have a friend who found 1 since the server merge and he's been playing steady day after day.

    I don't think there should be medals galore or the ludicrous rarity there is now. All they've done is gone from one extreme to another. So, what's the obvious solution? Ah, yes. Find a middle ground between the old system and the new one. Don't make them insanely rare like they are now, but don't make them as easy as before.

    There are also serious long term consequences to making medals as rare as they are now. A) Bullying is gonna be much more rampant, as it'll be much harder for people to move up and prosper having so few cities (it is infact virtually impossible to gain ranks and titles now) B) This one is also made worse by "A". Alot of people (especially brand new players, including people who would have been truly quality evony players) are simply gonna become to frustrated at how IMPOSSIBLE it is to move up in rank, and promptly quit, and/or be unable move up. They'll also be unable (in many respects) to fulfill their true potential in the game.

    Now I know there are people who would say "oh well then that weeds out people who shouldn't be playing the game" I have news for you - You're an idiot. Because with how rare medals are now, ANYONE is liable to become frustrated enough to put the game down for good. That's a fact. I understand what people are trying to say about making them rare or harder to get to present a challenge etc. and i actually agree, essentially I do. But the drop rate now is just insane. Doesn't benefit anyone or any type of player.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Why does it matter? Stalker!!
    Posts
    96

    Exclamation

    Quote Originally Posted by DoubleM View Post
    age 1 is most defiently better. there is a lot to hate about age 2 but what i hate about it the most is the part where you can use items to decrease someone's hero's attack level or what ever it was. that makes the rich man dominate the game which is unfair in this time being, every part of the world is in a recession. i rather pick a more even playing field than the rich man will win more than the poorer man.
    Facebook now gives free coins if you play FB games. I have 20 coins from playing Farmville & Evony Age II. I play Age I as well but it's not on FB.

    You only get one chance life is no Nintendo Game
    Rep if I make you happy

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    BOHEMIA
    Posts
    536

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 0Spawn0 View Post
    You completely off mate, with the new attack features AgeII is pretty much better then Age 1 in every way, also the Historic cities give new challenges for the best of players.

    Age2 all the way now, before long everyone will come to age2.
    i think your wrong some people like me will never go to age 2 sorry spawn but u wont win in that

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •