Quote Originally Posted by japanpimp View Post
LOL, ok. If that's the case, Spawn wins.
Heck, I wish someone would pay for my stuff.... anyone interested in sponsoring my Evony activities?



It was constructive. In fact, I complemented the OP on his hard work.
Then I added that process is more important. Then came you and the hater bandwagon which I had to defend against.
Well then where on earth were you to help stickup for my Evony game Overview?
My Overview did not deserve ANY negative feedback but you were quiet as a mouse.
In fact, Woldere said my original overview was good, then got on the hater bandwagon in the last couple of weeks and called my new one bad and said he was wrong on saying that my first one was good. You see a pattern here?
Um by the way, I can't check every post I see, I'm talking about the posts where there's basically nothing wrong with them, those are the ones that don't deserve much criticism at all... what process are talking about here, that's what we all want to know, even x~calibur was confused on what you meant...

And we're not talking negative feedback, we're talking constructive criticism, urs was negative "too technical and exaggerated upgrade costs" is basically a direct telling off on his whole thing instead of suggesting something to tweak in his formula or something along the lines of that but instead you just demeaned the whole thing (just bc u make 1 statement in the beginning doesn't mean it takes away the meaning of the post), and didn't bother to address his mathematical insight, just stated it's too technical and you only need to worry about the process... which I'm still confused what you even meant by that, he was very detailed regarding it...

not hating japanpimp, just trying to stop future posts that weren't needed (at least on a guide thread that basically has no wrong in it)

this pretty much sums up my point:

Quote Originally Posted by Woldere View Post
I've seen a lot of people who don't get variance, which is perfectly understandable, because in some ways, it goes against the human nature of trying to find patterns and draw conclusions from them.

However, to say someone's (correct) math is wrong because you've had a certain perception on a random string of events...