senses a lot of chain yanking
The debate and discussion ended a while back. Anything added now is moot and just plain theatrics.
senses a lot of chain yanking
The debate and discussion ended a while back. Anything added now is moot and just plain theatrics.
I now interrupt this semi-dead argument to bring up a new issue which has been bugging me:
Age.
I have seen several entries which did not look like they were 18 years or old. Now, I know people who are 18 and look younger. I will admit, I am one of them (people still think I'm a sophomore). I just don't see the point in putting a rule in which may be required by law, but is difficult to enforce. I'm sorry, but I'd hate for someone who breaks the rules to be chosen over me simply because there was no way to enforce it.
I suspect that even if it seems like they can get away with it now, that at some point their age will need to be revealed.
Comes back to proving one way or the other which is where things can become awkward, and i mean how far would you go to prove it, and what lengths would you have to go to satisfy their curiosity
Speaking of the lack of ability to debate vulgarwolf, you can argue semantics all you like but the non sensationalized facts of this matter is that you're stirring the pot and have been since the inception of the contest. And now you're butthurt that someone called you out for your bs. So now you're trying to degrade the contest from outside. It's such a typical rogue little boy on the playground who wasn't allowed to play in a specific game of dodgeball thing to do.
Furthermore, the mods will do as they see fit. If you don't like it then I should direct you to the upper right hand corner of your browser window.
/thread
Well I have had my suspicions about the actual purpose of the Queen contest. I won't go into detail, but I seem to have noticed the hot women they used to have in their banner ads have disappeared. So it stands to reason they need a legit replacement.
You can call it what you want, but others can see it as 2 sets of rules, i see you had nothing constructive to add, and its not the kid who couldntp lay dodgeball, its the kid who learned how to know the rules of dodgeball to play it as best he could....meanwhile were you the child who the teachers would always say "Cmon kids we have a duty of care, let vermallis have a turn throwing the ball", its okay if you werent very good at sports games, they arent for everybody
Last edited by vulgarwolf; 05-30-2009 at 07:39 PM.
There has been many posts where a case has been made, if your unable to read and understand it, i'm not going to go through it again.
Typically a case without evidence is no case at all.
Bookmarks