
Originally Posted by
DarkmaneZero
Repeating your already-refuted/rebutted claims isn't debating. Let us know when you can actually address what has been said. Start with why the nerf was necessary. I would enjoy that.
Higher rally? Already addressed
Draft from historicals? False
Higher resource fields? Already addressed
Policies? For real? LOL Already addressed
So, nothing here. Keep trying. You forgot to mention #5. Cool flags, lol.
So what if you just ignore multiple valid arguments and simply state "I have yet to hear a valid argument?" Try again.
Because you fantasize about killing more of your troops daily than anyone loses taking a 12 then what happens now? Oh yeah, nothing. This is a textbook fallacy, and a bad one at that. Learn how to debate. Stop repeating the same stuff.
Go find japanpimp (by looking in the mirror) and regale each other with stories of 'playing from the colonized position.'
You know what would be really great here? If only people that know what they are talking about were allowed to post; only people that have something to contribute; only people that have a vested stake in the argument. Like people that actually have taken HC's and perhaps people that supposedly are being terrorized by HC-drafted warriors. Everyone else doesn't have a dog in the fight. And random shills who repeat weak points and empty claims don't add to the debate, in my opinion.
Bookmarks