View Poll Results: Rome vs the Han Dynasty

Voters
19. You may not vote on this poll
  • Rome

    11 57.89%
  • China

    6 31.58%
  • Neither, both would have been equal.

    2 10.53%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Han Dynasty vs Rome.

Threaded View

  1. #4
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    New York, United States of America
    Posts
    758

    Default The Battle of Cynoscephalae: The Roman Legion versus the Macedonian Phalanx

    I must say that the Pre-Marian Roman legions served their purpose or fulfilled their role at the battle of Cynoscephalae [197 BCE] against King Philip V of Antigonid Macedonia. The Roman legions before the reforms of Gaius Marius in 107 BCE formed in a quincunx or a checker board formation and were divided into four lines: the Velites as javelinists, the Hastati, the Principes and the Triarii that imitated the style of the Grecian hoplitai as they formed in dense lines with protruding spears. Also, each consular army before the Marian reforms consisted of two Roman legions and two auxiliary legions. The Roman legions were flexible and mobile compared to the methodical, rigid and inflexible Macedonian phalanxes which depended on flat terrain and the protection of the flanks with either the hypaspistai who were able to fight as phalangists or as swift infantry units or heavy cavalry in order to maintain cohesion. The Macedonian and Hellenistic era phalanxes were susceptible to assaults on their rear and flanks. If the phalangists marched over rough terrain, the phalanx formation as a whole lost its cohesion and its marching order was disrupted in which narrow gaps would emerge from the divided, disorganized and slow moving ranks of the phalanx. The Grecian phalanx functioned through the othismos or the frontal push which consisted of the hoplitai [Hoplites] pushing the opposing forces in a shoving match with the weight of their shields and the press of bodies while a well formed Hellenistic era phalanx worked alongside a line or a screen of peltasts, the hypaspistai and heavy cavalry and was intended to contain enemy forces before the arrival of the kataphractoi or the cataphracts and other cavalry forces who would then envelop the enemy force fixing the enemy between the bristling pikes of the phalangists and the swords and lances of the kataphractoi.

    At the battle of Cynoscephalae in 197 BCE and later at the battle of Pydna in 168 BCE, the role of the Roman legions was to absorb the massive frontal impact of the Macedonian phalanxes which proved impenetrable in the front due to the protruding sarrisae of the Macedonians. However, due to the rough terrain, the iron discipline and the superior flexibility and mobility of the Roman legions, the Romans held their ground and allowed the Macedonians despite their furious assault to push forward in a disorganized mass in their feverish excitement during the point of the greatest confusion of the battle. The Roman legions were slowly being pushed back due to the determination and the bristling sarissae or pikes of the Macedonians. However, the Romans were absorbing the vicious frontal assault maintained by the Macedonians in which due to the cacophony or the great clamor of noise during battle, the great shrieks and groans of dying men and the resultant confusion, a considerable gap appeared between the two main formations of the Macedonian army. The Roman legions slowly gave ground to the Macedonian phalanxes so as to allow the gap in the Macedonian forces to widen which was then exploited by the Romans. A thunderous charge by the Roman equites drove a wedge between the two main Macedonian forces and split the Macedonian forces into two smaller and inferior forces. The Roman cavalry then encircled or surrounded the hard pressed and disconcerted Macedonian phalangists while the Roman infantrymen renewed their defense and managed to viciously attack the flanks of the Macedonian formations leading to the destruction of the phalanx as a formation or unit and to the slaughter of the individual Macedonian soldier.

    I must say that due to its greater flexibility and mobility and its relations with a small but determined cavalry arm and an auxiliary branch, the Roman legion was superior to the Macedonian phalanx or to the phalanxes of the Hellenistic Period. Eventually, Rome's superior military skill, advanced technology and political acumen led to its subjugation of the other Mediterranean kingdoms and civilizations and rendered Rome the sole power of the Mediterranean basin and the sovereign mistress of the civilized world.
    Last edited by Conrad_Jalowski; 08-29-2010 at 06:47 PM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •