* Jealousy*
* Jealousy*
Only my attempt at at differentiating between a pure jaq hit and an impure jaq hit. Im here to learn myselfGuess what i meant was a pure Jaq hit is simply a hit that can't be improved upon.
Removing the pult would have resulted in swords hitting on archers in round 3 suffering no losses. Then round 4 another full swing, then suffering loses at the end of that round. Im thinking a little higher attack hero while keeping int cap for swords and you may have taken out all archers by round 5 while still having 40k swords or so left to take on 10k ATs.
Still a loss imo as swords don't fare too well against Ats but a slight improvement.
Your hit replicated but with int capped pikes instead of swords and a hero around same attack would be an interesting comparison
1 trap on defence and this attack would have failed
well done staxs
Nice hit.
This might be my favorite kind of attack.
Thats the idea of exploring |Evony
http://img535.imageshack.us/f/swordmen.jpg
Sorry cant post the screen shot, im terrinle with these... but heres a minor swordsmack
Last edited by Dressner; 09-28-2010 at 07:36 PM. Reason: picture wasnt showing up
that is very much the truth this in a typical Jaq setup according to layers and #s being precise but it is however one of the better layers for this type of defense (given the statement about the lack of cav) i would presume that he didnt realize the issue of the faster layers would remove it from being called a Jaq but they would have helped had the defender built some warriors or some other type of fodder. anyhow i use swords all the time in the same fashion. so ill try to scamper up a few reports this weekend. got bout 600k swords to kill off lol
Bookmarks