My equation to model the expansion of the universe

[acer5200]

WHy did you make this thread again...
This fits the exact definition of insanity.
Doing the same thing over and over again expecting a diffrent result.

Actually, I believe that this is the first one he made.

[Moghedien]

There are like 3 threads like this is this the first one of them?
Did they delete the others?

[acer5200]

I believe the others were locked and subsequently archived.

[Humility]

If im not mistaken, the speed of light is more a measure of distance then time. Also to factor in the time it takes light to run from end to end in the universe will be even more impossible then equating the expansion of the universe.

Lastly the highlighted segment shows that what you are saying is this: As the expansion of the universe slows down, it also speeds up. That makes no sense.

But like I always say, this is just my opinion.

You are thinking light years, the speed of light is literally the speed that a particle of light travels. From what I understand, relative to the speed of light, you can never go faster, which is why if you objects are accelerating away from each other at different rates, two particles of light that start in the middle will still reach them at the same time.

And no that is not what I'm saying, since the big bang the velocity of the universe has been slowing, however the rate of deceleration has been decreasing. It is not a constant, but it is a factor of relative gravity and the relative speed of light.

Your model seems to ignore special relativity.

[Moghedien]

Humility unless you discover a ancient artifact called mass effect

[Humility]

Huh? I didn't catch that. I never heard of Mass Effect, though I admit I usually just skim what I read, so I may be missing some aspects of knowledge.