Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 43

Thread: Multiple Kings/Queens

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default Multiple Kings/Queens

    I have noticed ppl collecting multiple kings and queens. Is this ok? Does evony have an official stance on the issue?

    I assume they do not becuase it is very easy to check on.


    It is also very easy to do without multi-accounting/glitches or breaking any other ToS rules. I won't mention the method here becuase it may not be considered ok.

    Am I behind the curve here? is it something everyone is doing?

    Or any other thoughts on the issue.

  2. #2

    Default

    As far as I'm concerned, its a feat hard enough to be OK
    Thanks WN1 Hit for the sig!

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zeptuno View Post
    As far as I'm concerned, its a feat hard enough to be OK
    Its actually really easy, if you thought about it a bit more i think you would see what i mean

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by webby189 View Post
    Its actually really easy, if you thought about it a bit more i think you would see what i mean
    ??? I don't understand what you mean by easy.

    And thats true Rota, but I don't see how getting more than one queen would be considered an exploit when people are running around with as many as 75 Historic Heroes.
    Thanks WN1 Hit for the sig!

  5. #5

    Default

    I wouldn't risk accumulating Kings/Queens.
    Multiple Kings/Queens sounds like Evony might consider it a ToS violation covered under rules 3.1 and 3.3 in the code of conduct.
    Code of Conduct.
    As with all things, your use of the Game and the Service is governed by certain rules. These rules (the "Code of Conduct"), maintained and enforced exclusively by REGAN MERCANTILE US, LLC, must be adhered to by all users. It is your responsibility to know, understand and abide by this Code of Conduct. The following rules are not meant to be exhaustive, and REGAN MERCANTILE US, LLC reserves the right to determine which conduct it considers to be outside the spirit of the Game and to take such disciplinary measures as it sees fit up to and including termination and deletion of the Account. REGAN MERCANTILE US, LLC reserves the right to modify this Code of Conduct at any time.

    3) Rules Related to Game Play.
    Game play is what Evony is all about, and REGAN MERCANTILE US, LLC strictly enforces the rules that govern game play. REGAN MERCANTILE US, LLC considers most conduct to be part of the Game, and not harassment, so player-killing the enemies of your alliance is considered a part of the Game. Because the Game is a "player vs. player" game, you should always remember to protect yourself in areas where others can attack you, rather than contacting REGAN MERCANTILE US, LLC’s in-game customer service representatives for help when you have been killed by another player. Nonetheless, certain acts go beyond what is "fair" and are considered serious violations of these Terms of Use. Those acts include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following:

    3.1) Using or exploiting errors in design, features which have not been documented, and/or "program bugs" to gain access that is otherwise not available, or to obtain a competitive advantage over other players;

    3.2) Conduct prohibited by the EULA or elsewhere in these Terms of Use; and

    3.3) Anything that REGAN MERCANTILE US, LLC considers contrary to the "essence" of the Game.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lazzzzzzzzalicious! View Post
    i started to read this and agree with everything rota says. if people just listened to him the forums would be a better place.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dawnseeker View Post
    Rota is correct.

    I don't even understand the question.

  6. #6

    Default

    Hmm interesting thoughts Rota I actually read that before I posted. I'm not sure why Evony would allow the capture of a king/queen if they only wanted you to have one

    Its almost like giving a city to an alliance mate, which i have to assume is within the ToS.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by webby189 View Post
    Hmm interesting thoughts Rota I actually read that before I posted. I'm not sure why Evony would allow the capture of a king/queen if they only wanted you to have one

    Its almost like giving a city to an alliance mate, which i have to assume is within the ToS.
    I'm not saying it IS against the rules. I can just see the argument being made, easily.
    I'm only saying I wouldn't risk it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lazzzzzzzzalicious! View Post
    i started to read this and agree with everything rota says. if people just listened to him the forums would be a better place.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dawnseeker View Post
    Rota is correct.

    I don't even understand the question.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rota View Post
    I'm not saying it IS against the rules. I can just see the argument being made, easily.
    I'm only saying I wouldn't risk it.
    Yeah that and it doesn't pass the gut check test.

    It just doesn't seem right for some reason if u know what i mean.


    At the same time if its common practice and legal, i dont wanna fall behind the curve.

    Thats kinda why i posted here hoping for an official response, but believe me im not holding my breath.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rota View Post
    I'm not saying it IS against the rules. I can just see the argument being made, easily.
    I'm only saying I wouldn't risk it.
    So If a city is guarded by a king or queen we shouldnt risk attacking and capture it?

    the only way this can be called an exploit(IMO), is if you have mutiple accounts, and that is allready considered a exploit in itself.

    Lynx
    NA20
    Last edited by Lynxern; 10-01-2010 at 07:59 AM.

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lynxern View Post
    So If a city is guarded by a king or queen we shouldnt risk attacking and capture it?
    I just wouldn't recruit the captured King/Queen. I'm not saying you shouldn't attack or even capture the city/hero. I'm just saying I would err on the side of caution.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lazzzzzzzzalicious! View Post
    i started to read this and agree with everything rota says. if people just listened to him the forums would be a better place.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dawnseeker View Post
    Rota is correct.

    I don't even understand the question.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •