The expansion of our universe

[Bree Fletcher]

Hol on... you are mixing up your own terminology all over the place. Applying arbitrary labels to some concepts doesn't mean you can suddenly apply, say, electromagnetic theory to dark matter.

It is believed that the mass of this singularity is all of the matter in our universe. The term used to describe this is known as the Super Atom. However, at one point, this singularity (the Super Atom) expanded from a point to just a few planck lengths across...

...There is one problem with this. The universe started as an atom. Atoms in their natural state have a neutral charge, and only outside effects can change the charge.

Nowhere did you prove that the "super atom" is actually a single atom. In fact, logic would dictate that, despite being packed in the space normally reserved for one atom, it is still however many of them that exist. (Well, that or some strange amalgam of energy, that's entirely possible, but at any rate, that means using properties of atoms makes even less sense.) Therefore, you can't apply anything relating to a single atom.

...If energy has a positive charge and dark energy has a negative charge they should negate each other, resulting in a universe with a charge of zero...

Whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa. Calling normal energy "positive" and dark energy "negative" makes about as much sense as calling quarks "truth" or "beauty." May work just to be able to put a name on the thing, but there's no relation between the labels and he functionings. You can't start applying any amount of electromagnetic theory to this thing here, no more than I can start talking about chromatology in the "beauty" of a quark.

...how can density affect mass?

I have 1 liter of water. I know that water has a density of 1kg/L. Well... there's really only one thing I can figure for the mass of that water right there.

You make good points, but some things are simply unexplainable and must be left as scientific phenomina (like what I said about black holes.)

That sounds an awful lot like the "God did it, we can't understand it" argument...