The expansion of our universe

[Oss Spy]

And away we go!

Hol on... you are mixing up your own terminology all over the place. Applying arbitrary labels to some concepts doesn't mean you can suddenly apply, say, electromagnetic theory to dark matter.
Nowhere did you prove that the "super atom" is actually a single atom. In fact, logic would dictate that, despite being packed in the space normally reserved for one atom, it is still however many of them that exist. (Well, that or some strange amalgam of energy, that's entirely possible, but at any rate, that means using properties of atoms makes even less sense.) Therefore, you can't apply anything relating to a single atom.
Whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa. Calling normal energy "positive" and dark energy "negative" makes about as much sense as calling quarks "truth" or "beauty." May work just to be able to put a name on the thing, but there's no relation between the labels and he functionings. You can't start applying any amount of electromagnetic theory to this thing here, no more than I can start talking about chromatology in the "beauty" of a quark.
I have 1 liter of water. I know that water has a density of 1kg/L. Well... there's really only one thing I can figure for the mass of that water right there.
That sounds an awful lot like the "God did it, we can't understand it" argument...

Yes, I know my terminology has a habit getting thrown around quite a bit. To be fair, I haven't had anyone proof read it yet I coined the term "super atom" from a show I watched (it was on the Science channel, I no longer remember what the show was called nor the name of the man who used the term first but I would recognize a picture of him) a few years ago that discussed a few of the same points I've made. I assumed that other people had knowledge of a similar thing (a lapse in judgement on my part.) When I said super atom, I meant the singularity/point where the universe expanded. I know that I never proved it was an atom, but think about it logically- something that contains everything in our universe. It is not the size of an atom. I merely believe that it had properties like an atom. My reason for believing is that I simply do- a reason that cannot be explained or broken down. It's just a part of my belief (I'll try to elaborate later though, it's getting late here and I'm getting tired.)

In fact, logic would dictate that, despite being packed in the space normally reserved for one atom, it is still however many of them that exist. (Well, that or some strange amalgam of energy, that's entirely possible, but at any rate, that means using properties of atoms makes even less sense.) Therefore, you can't apply anything relating to a single atom.

Although I've said this before, a super atom is not an atom like what we have around us. A super atom contains all of the matter and energy that is in our universe. Why would there be another

Whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa. Calling normal energy "positive" and dark energy "negative" makes about as much sense as calling quarks "truth" or "beauty." May work just to be able to put a name on the thing, but there's no relation between the labels and he functionings. You can't start applying any amount of electromagnetic theory to this thing here, no more than I can start talking about chromatology in the "beauty" of a quark.

It seems as though I miss-typed. I meant pressure in the sense that positive pressure causes things to compress, and since negative is the opposite of positive, negative pressure will cause things to expand. Again, I'm sorry that I forgot a key word. I'll edit that soon. Electromagnetic theory isn't relevant on large scale (correct me if I'm mistaken, but when I say that I'm thinking of the strong an weak nuclear force. Please correct me and elaborate on what electtromagnetic theory is if I'm wrong.)

I have 1 liter of water. I know that water has a density of 1kg/L. Well... there's really only one thing I can figure for the mass of that water right there.
That sounds an awful lot like the "God did it, we can't understand it" argument...

I don't see how the "God argument" applies here...

Sorry that I missed your post. As you may know the other thread got locked and I vanished for about a week.