Here you are: i + 3i = 4i
Heehee. No. That's not how you get an imaginary number. Let me rephrase since you're an idiot: Show me an equation that has real factors and an odd number of imaginary solutions.


[QUOTE]Saying it's hypothetical doesn't mean you can ignore logic when thinking within the hypothetical framework. You still need to try to form logical conclusions based on the assumptions you give.[QUOTE]
Haven't ignored logic, sorry to say.


Hey, what's that up there... it looks like my point! Wow, that is quite a distance up... certainly high enough to be going over your head.
Thanks for missing my point and taking out the information that benefits your argument! Great job.



Don't tell me what infinite means when I already demonstrated I do completely know what it means. We can rule out "infinitely short" for this case; there we'd be essentially taking the limit as the distance goes to 0, indicating the universes exist in the same exact place. Infinitely large distance is possible, but I'm saying not necessarily true. It could just as easily be any other distance. Now that last sentence I never disputed. But you can travel between two parallel planes by taking the z-direction, (assuming the planes are oriented x-y) so why can't you do the same with more than three?
You clearly don't know what infinity is if you don't know where infinity comes from. Tell me where infinity comes from and I'll believe you, even though I've said it already...multiple times. How do you cross something that doesn't intersect? Try crossing two parallel paths in a forest without going through woods. You can go as far as you want, however, you won't reach the other path. If two things are parallel you'll never be able to reach the other. Think of it like this: How do you reach something you can't see? How do you graph an imaginary number if you have real axes?

Now, that's not proof. I realize. But... I'm not the one trying to prove anything by this thread; you are. And you seem to keep masking your own lack of proof by asking disputers for theirs.
I've been proving things and you've been disputing it with random crap...I must admire your BSing abilities.


[QUOTE]I'm not. Who said I was? You started this thread for a discussion, and a discussion I'll give. Just because it isn't "OMG you're so smart, OSS Spy!" Doesn't mean I'm trying to be mean.[QUOTE]
You've argued with every point I've made in every thread I've made. Until you can prove otherwise that you're arguing for the sake of arguing, I must assume that you're disagreeing because you dislike me because there is no other answer.


Ever hear that one song? Goes something like:

"You're so vain... you probably think this song is about you, don't you?"


I believe what I believe, and keep it to myself unless I feel that I can actually back it up with evidence.
Proof that I'm not vain can be found when you read over everything I've ever said. Never have I said I was smarter, never have I implied it (to anybody with an intelligent post; I don't respond nicely to random idiots), no have I shown any evidence of me being conceited. I never thought that song was about me but now that you sang it to me...I'm quite flattered.