Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 25

Thread: Moving Forward

  1. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StormWolf View Post
    But....we can't....we aren't allowed to loot fellow alliance members...grrr...

    I still want yer valleys.
    i left the alliance when i quit.

    were you in my alliance?

  2. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fianna View Post
    They'd probably criticize the way we do warfare in the modern world. We fly a mile up and drop explosives on whatever happens to be underneath. Who's really more stupid?

    You mean who's more stupid, the guys who charge headlong into cannon fire, suffering massive casualties. Or the guys who decimate 100 times more landmass and possible army size while only sacrificing money?

  3. #13

    Default

    If they wanted to fix ballista and archers, instead of moving forward, how about each round consumes an amount of lumber and iron consistent with projectiles being fired. Kills two birds with one stone (stops the abuse and mirrors reality where no idiot would move into range of an inferior army.)

    Just my thoughts.

  4. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Krazed View Post
    You mean who's more stupid, the guys who charge headlong into cannon fire, suffering massive casualties. Or the guys who decimate 100 times more landmass and possible army size while only sacrificing money?
    um, I'd still say the people who kill more ar estupider.

    Remember, Evony is a game. In real life you can't endlessly rebuild troops.
    Warning - Preceding message may contain high levels of sarcasm.

  5. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fianna View Post
    They'd probably criticize the way we do warfare in the modern world. We fly a mile up and drop explosives on whatever happens to be underneath. Who's really more stupid?
    WEll who lost more lives. On a simple balance sheet Iraq and Afhganistan together still have had less casulties then the average day in Vietnam. Vietnam had less casualties then some single battles in WWI or WWII.

    IS bombing from a B52 at 35000 feet with JDAM weapons the way of the great knights no. BEcuase they didnt have B52's and JDAM weapons.

    THough shorter range does increase accuracy the vast majority of tacticians will tell you that if you can fire from range and inflict casulties on your enemy whiletaking none in return your a fool not to.

    BUT EVONY IS NOT THE REAL WORLD as folks have pointed out at several occasions.
    There are only Four boxes to use in defense of Democracry Ballot, Jury, Soap, And Ammo. Use in that order.

  6. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fianna View Post
    They'd probably criticize the way we do warfare in the modern world. We fly a mile up and drop explosives on whatever happens to be underneath. Who's really more stupid?
    For nigh 300 years we stood masses of troops with rifles in pure block formations against each other fired calmly at each other front line first, then front line would get on one knee and second line would fire... Each force ~200 feet apart... Shot ripping limbs off people standing next to you... The psychological damage to those who fought in such wars was insane... Reading american civil war compilitatiosn will explain that one far better than me... Or even United States Revolutionary War...

    I'd take war before or after this block of history... by WW1 we limited our weapons of war (though gas attacks and flame throwers were still in use at that point and both were horrifying weapons)... I'd rather take the chances back in ancient times in say... the roman legion... Though being infantry still rahter sucked... cavalry and archers were better palces to stay... infantry death rates were extreme (the rates varied, but 'acceptable losses' of infantry were usually 40% or greater)...

  7. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by theshadow99 View Post
    For nigh 300 years we stood masses of troops with rifles in pure block formations against each other fired calmly at each other front line first, then front line would get on one knee and second line would fire... Each force ~200 feet apart... Shot ripping limbs off people standing next to you... The psychological damage to those who fought in such wars was insane... Reading american civil war compilitatiosn will explain that one far better than me... Or even United States Revolutionary War...

    I'd take war before or after this block of history... by WW1 we limited our weapons of war (though gas attacks and flame throwers were still in use at that point and both were horrifying weapons)... I'd rather take the chances back in ancient times in say... the roman legion... Though being infantry still rahter sucked... cavalry and archers were better palces to stay... infantry death rates were extreme (the rates varied, but 'acceptable losses' of infantry were usually 40% or greater)...
    i agree with everything you say, except that first line. rifles weren't really used until the early 19th century. muskets were used before that.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Out agitatin' the dots...are you a dot??
    Posts
    564

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Timotheos View Post
    i left the alliance when i quit.

    were you in my alliance?

    My bad...yer name is 1 letter off from someone in my alliance, and my eyes are bleary from attending so many funerals of lost loyal soldiers, while also searching with a fine tooth comb for that blasted serial number...

    Never mind...carry on...
    U noć idem, sjećanje jedan trn od zalosne, dalje prema smrti.
    Into the night I go, memory a thorn of sorrow, onward toward death.


    Death feels like the butterfly, can't escape the scarred lie
    ~Skinny Puppy: haZe~


    So, drifting through the dark
    The sympathy of night's mercy inside my heart
    Is your life the same? Do ghosts cry tears? Do they feel years?
    As time just goes on and on and on

    ~TransSiberian Orchestra: Back to a Reason, pt2~

  9. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StormWolf View Post
    My bad...yer name is 1 letter off from someone in my alliance, and my eyes are bleary from attending so many funerals of lost loyal soldiers, while also searching with a fine tooth comb for that blasted serial number...

    Never mind...carry on...
    is that that Timotheoss character?

  10. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Timotheos View Post
    i agree with everything you say, except that first line. rifles weren't really used until the early 19th century. muskets were used before that.
    rifling (which is hwere the term 'rifle' comes form) was invented in the 16th century... Though tehcnically the muskets were more of the style of the revoluntionary war era, I just got tired of seperating them from the later rifles by writing 'Rifles/Muskets' as I did earlier... The practical differences were rather small for most of that period...

    A few people made good use of rifling though when they created 'long rifles' (Davy Crockett is a good name to look up on that concept)...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •