Results 1 to 10 of 67

Thread: im back heheh

Threaded View

  1. #36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Satan View Post
    Rota, I highly disagree with you. First of, Age II players have a far bigger army than any other Age I players. I don't understand why Age II is viewed as soft. Everyone's highly generic comments about Age II is getting kind of annoying.
    1) How big would Age 1 armies be in comparison if Age 1 had no refuge? They would be absolutely obscene, even with twice the upkeep.
    2) Age 2 players are used to a mountain of freebies with all the FB gifts.

    I think free gifts, and no refuge are the two biggest reasons Age 2 players are considered soft (Also the "no attack button" on some servers). It's not really that Age 2 players ARE soft, because they aren't. They are simply softer than Age 1 players, it's like comparing granite and chalk. Both are solid stone, but one is clearly more hardened than the other.


    And as I said before, my statement does not apply to Age 1 veterans that are now Age 2 players, like you. So, there's no reason for you to take that statement personally.

    I believe the gaming experience in Age 1 lends itself to expeditious success in Age 2. But, I don't think experience the gaming experience of Age 2 lends itself to rapid success in Age 1.
    Last edited by Rota; 11-06-2010 at 11:07 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lazzzzzzzzalicious! View Post
    i started to read this and agree with everything rota says. if people just listened to him the forums would be a better place.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dawnseeker View Post
    Rota is correct.

    I don't even understand the question.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •