Page 11 of 12 FirstFirst ... 9101112 LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 114

Thread: REVIVAL: Stump the person below you! (game)

  1. #101
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    6,839

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Demonhero View Post
    Yes, yes he did.
    Was it because he was hung like a horse?
    Reality scripted TV.
    Chasing fifteen minutes of fame.
    Fight over fuel.
    Violence in school.
    The youth are as confused as I am.

  2. #102

    Default

    The knight facing the opposite direction can tell his helmet colour. He may not be able to see the other knights but he will be able to see their coloured feathers over the wall

  3. #103
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The pacific Asylum for the incurably insane
    Posts
    112

    Default

    no he cannot see them

  4. #104
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    RL kiddnapped my, bbl
    Posts
    3,588

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Demonhero View Post
    Here's a riddle I came up with for an assignment in high school:

    A knight goes to his king one day and says that his king must choose one of four paths for the knight. One path leads to death by fire, another to the gallows, on one an executioner prepares his axe, and on the last he would be drawn and quartered.
    The knight and the king talk for some time, and at the end of it, the king orders him to be hanged.
    Why?

    *The use of "path" is entirely metaphorical.
    all i can think is that taking into account the weight of the armor a hanging would be the fastest way to go.
    or the modes of death are tied to the "crime" that caused them, but i cant remember all the reasons-causes ties.
    fire for heretics
    quartering and beheading for treason
    leaving hanging for criminals.

    but i could be wrong on both accounts

  5. #105
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    No Fixed Address
    Posts
    523

    Default

    Aha! A knight wears a gorget - he can survive a hanging, maybe?

    I think I'm missing something obscure and historical.
    "You might very well think that; I couldn't possibly comment." -Francis Urquhart

  6. #106
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The pacific Asylum for the incurably insane
    Posts
    112

    Default

    is it becuase he was ordering the king to choose for him?

    a king might get pretty angry over that.

  7. #107
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    The great white north.
    Posts
    4,444

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by imnothere View Post
    all i can think is that taking into account the weight of the armor a hanging would be the fastest way to go.
    or the modes of death are tied to the "crime" that caused them, but i cant remember all the reasons-causes ties.
    fire for heretics
    quartering and beheading for treason
    leaving hanging for criminals.

    but i could be wrong on both accounts
    This is pretty close^.

  8. #108
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    No Fixed Address
    Posts
    523

    Default

    The riddle doesn't explicitly state that the knight would be the one to face all of these, unless I'm mistaken in the intent.

    So... (speculating here) the knight advises the king that he should mend his ways, for the king now risks charges of heresy. There will be censure, excommunication, and revolution; the king risks losing his throne, and possibly even risks the stake. (Hence the fire and the axe.) His objections become strenuous and heated, angering the king, who determines that this is treason.

    The king sentences the knight to be hanged, drawn and quartered - in keeping with the crime. The sentence is later commuted to a simple execution.

    Sounds like we're talking about Sir Thomas More and Henry VIII to me. Of course, Sir Thomas was beheaded... but he was originally sentenced to be hanged, then drawn and quartered; this followed his objection to Anne Boelyn as Henry's second wife (while Catherine of Aragon was still alive) and Henry's subsequent suppression of the Catholic church in England.

    Just a guess, though.
    "You might very well think that; I couldn't possibly comment." -Francis Urquhart

  9. #109
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    The great white north.
    Posts
    4,444

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gnerphk View Post
    The riddle doesn't explicitly state that the knight would be the one to face all of these, unless I'm mistaken in the intent.

    So... (speculating here) the knight advises the king that he should mend his ways, for the king now risks charges of heresy. There will be censure, excommunication, and revolution; the king risks losing his throne, and possibly even risks the stake. (Hence the fire and the axe.) His objections become strenuous and heated, angering the king, who determines that this is treason.

    The king sentences the knight to be hanged, drawn and quartered - in keeping with the crime. The sentence is later commuted to a simple execution.

    Sounds like we're talking about Sir Thomas More and Henry VIII to me. Of course, Sir Thomas was beheaded... but he was originally sentenced to be hanged, then drawn and quartered; this followed his objection to Anne Boelyn as Henry's second wife (while Catherine of Aragon was still alive) and Henry's subsequent suppression of the Catholic church in England.

    Just a guess, though.
    You're close, but I think you're overthinking it.

    The knight confessed to four different crimes to his king, the penalties for which were four different death sentences.

  10. #110
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    No Fixed Address
    Posts
    523

    Default

    Ah! Treason, murder, lese majeste, heresy - that sort of thing.
    "You might very well think that; I couldn't possibly comment." -Francis Urquhart

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •