Off-Topic Elections

[John Adams]

It's not broad at all. Do I sense that you are unwilling to commit to an answer? If so, I'll stop asking.

Yes, it is.

The right to vote on what?

Taxes? Government? Elected officals? Foodstamps? Execution? Manner of public transportation? Number of children? Number of pets? Number of people in (or on) a city block?
The list continues...


Right to vote is simply too big of a catigory...

I am more then willing to entertain debate... But a catigory, too broad, will simply merrit a response too big for many to read.

For example, a short response to that catigorical statement, could read as follows:

Yes, people should have the right to vote. However, that right to vote should be curtailed to certain topics only. For example, people would not have the right to vote for the execution of their fellow man, that would be up to the leader. They would be allowed to vote, or chose, what manner of transportation they use to take to work everyday.

~John