Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Merging all Age I servers...

  1. #1

    Default Merging all Age I servers...

    Ok, I gotta ask why not do this? On my server the game is almost all dead. No players are no where near me, and No one ever talks on world chat anymore.

    It is like literally dead. So I don't get why not merge all these servers together in one to make a nice crowded and much more warfare and active server?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    621

    Default

    Then people will just complain there is no room for their npcs, whatever is done someone complains...

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trewqp View Post
    Ok, I gotta ask why not do this? On my server the game is almost all dead. No players are no where near me, and No one ever talks on world chat anymore.
    Not all the servers are like that

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The last Historic Poster hideout
    Posts
    6,383

    Default

    I think this would cost more money to do then money gained... It's a similar process from going to age I to age II in a way, most people wont want it, it wont come out positive money wise, and it will take a looooot of work to do. I say no because of this... And the other servers aren't in the same state as your one is


    ~R
    Last edited by Reasoner; 01-09-2011 at 11:33 PM.

  5. Default

    Yeeeeeah, there would need to be a gigantic map. People could not attack an enemy across the map for example. Would just create more camper attacks imo.

    Week 9 voting and Week 10 entries.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rota View Post
    I'm not sure if there was a counterpoint in there. But, if it will make you happy, then I yield the dispute to put an end to this tangent. You win.
    I won!
    Enter the Void - My Video Gaming Forum

  6. #6

    Default

    If you server is almost that dead, then it is probably on the list of the next group of servers to be merged.

    Most servers are not like that. So if yours is, be patient.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LordMac123 View Post
    Yeeeeeah, there would need to be a gigantic map. People could not attack an enemy across the map for example. Would just create more camper attacks imo.
    Maybe a 2000x2000 map?

    You could make a deal with someone 1414.2 miles away from your enemy to send a single pult with a a handful of transports for food costs to attack your enemy. In exchange, you do the same for his foe. You could each send a nearly 200 hour march at the targets to keep their birds blinking.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lazzzzzzzzalicious! View Post
    i started to read this and agree with everything rota says. if people just listened to him the forums would be a better place.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dawnseeker View Post
    Rota is correct.

    I don't even understand the question.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Derby, United Kingdom.
    Posts
    7,865

    Default

    A possible problem with this idea is that when things become quiet, which they will, there will be no more servers to merge it with, and over time it will mean the end of Age I completely. I think the current rate of merges is enough to keep people playing while at the same time ensuring end-game is as long as possible.

    Quote Originally Posted by Alusair View Post
    If you don't care enough to make yourself understandable, don't be surprised if others don't care enough to try to figure out what you're trying to tell them.

  9. #9

    Default

    reasons why not:
    1. the lag
    2. the size
    3. the world chat spam
    4. the inactives
    5. the newer servers would be at a disadvantage and the old ones would win
    6. no npc space
    oh, and did i say its stupid?

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aragorn123 View Post
    reasons why not:
    1. the lag
    2. the size
    3. the world chat spam
    4. the inactives
    5. the newer servers would be at a disadvantage and the old ones would win
    6. no npc space
    oh, and did i say its stupid?
    1. Agreed.
    2. Agreed.
    3. NOT agreed! WC would be epic! It would be hilarious!
    4. Not Agreed... maybe. If they did a project this HUGE, they should have the decency to find a way to shed all the truly inactives.
    5. Half-agreed. The newest servers would be at a disadvantage. But, even 6 month old servers have pro alliances that could handle competition with even the oldest servers.
    6. Half-agreed. It depends on how big they really make it, and if they dump truly inactives.
    7. Agreed. It is stupid, but the potential logistics are a fun discussion.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lazzzzzzzzalicious! View Post
    i started to read this and agree with everything rota says. if people just listened to him the forums would be a better place.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dawnseeker View Post
    Rota is correct.

    I don't even understand the question.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •