Quote Originally Posted by Boleslav View Post
That is a natural product of venturing out of the server forums and into more public parts of the forum. Plus now many people give serious rep. When I started as mod I had 2 rep points and now I have around 2600ish. They accumulate quickly. Stick around and see!

*sigh*


I'm going to say NO for the trial at least. But this is a great question that I want to hear people's opinions on.

Obviously this cant be something done on a whim and out of the blue it should require that the player in question frequently causes problems with in the RP maybe not with the running of it but clashing with another player directly or through actions

ie Player A believes no matter what everybody deserves fair trial before a judge and it is not the players jobs to doll out justice Player B goes out of his way in part because he enjoys it but also to spite player A who he thinks is to full of himself to circumvent that and kills when capture is possible for crimes a person has committed

I think there should be some back and forth when with you boleslav before it happens siting why the person wants to kill the other players characters building a case so to speak.

It should also be on equal footing you cant push somebody off a cliff stab them in there back or kill the person in a way that there is no chance to fight back, using the the players mentioned above.

As the party finishes killing the Thugs hired to protect the merchant who was been kidnapping young girls and selling them across the border as slaves Player A notices Player B lifting his axe to kill the merchant who has dropped to his knees and is begging for mercy, Player A fed up with the repeated abuse of power in his eyes decides enough is enough and intercedes stopping the killing blow with his sword and leveling a cold stare at Player B.
Player A then tells Player B in a cold tone "I have let you take the law into your own hands for the last time if your so eager to kill him, then you can go through me"

then the players square off maybe have set guide lines each player has 3 responses once the duel has started you would have to refferee bole only in that each player says what they are going to do, you interoperate that write how our planned actions play out and then we respond again you interoperate respond and you decide who lives and dies

i would suggest the challanged has the first move so to speak once the duel is commensed he has to post first followed by the challanger followed by you and then in reverse order so the duel for the above circumstance would look like this
B
A
Reff
A
B
Reff
B
A
outcome

or another way which i actually kinda like better because it makes things more interesting is once a duel is declared both players private message you there desired moves you take both into consideration and then post in the thread the results of the first round, along with copy and pastes of what each person sent you, then round 2 takes place and then round 3 etc till a winner is decided

read bolded statements!