Page 91 of 154 FirstFirst ... 41818990919293101141 ... LastLast
Results 901 to 910 of 1540

Thread: Server Discussion Thread

  1. #901
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Lost in Space
    Posts
    570

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ellaranna View Post
    (I know someone is gonna bring up the Konflikt issue and how Zhay got booted from coalition for not turning them red, so before they do I will enlighten you all about what really happened. R0HAN did set Konflikt red, but Zhay then went behind our backs and against the recommendations of her own VHs and set them neutral. and after everything else she had done over the past few months we had no choice but to kick her. If she cant be honest about such a small issue, how do we know she is being honest about bigger ones?)
    I dnt blame zhay anywayz that coalition needed to end or should end because coalitions are what destroy the game(coming from me which is weird).

    Not saying families or friendlies are bad because they aren't but these official united fronts are horrible (too much politics which shouldn't be in a game) and not fair on other alliances "U either join or die" and they cause too much corruption

    but anywayz when they collapse over issues thats my cup of tea for all the drama produced is good entertainment
    Last edited by @strobot; 07-07-2011 at 12:51 PM.

    85/ss27/ss56-Attribute<>SemperFi
    92/ss29/ss57-System<>Blyksheep
    138-System>Static
    154-System
    170-Static

  2. #902

    Default

    We dont get people to join or die. Ive never agreed with that tactic and never will. Yes I have had a few reds join us, but not cause we were gonna kill them if they didnt, they joined cause they saw what a great alliance we were and wanted to be a part of it. join or die really usually only leads to spys anyway. Where as I prefer people that want to be here and want to fight with us then people that think they have no other option.

    Plus all that coalition ever was is a family. We never even gave ourself the name coaltion, that was done by our reds on the last server. All we ever were was a group of friends that fought together. We didnt want to dominate the server, we never wanted to kill off other alliances, we just wanted to play the game together as allies. If we really are as bad as people seem to think then we would have just killed off everyone on last server. We had the ability and numbers to do so, but that was not what we wanted.

  3. #903
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    82 42′0″N, 114 24′0″W - looking for santa
    Posts
    864

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ellaranna View Post
    (I know someone is gonna bring up the Konflikt issue and how Zhay got booted from coalition for not turning them red, so before they do I will enlighten you all about what really happened. R0HAN did set Konflikt red, but Zhay then went behind our backs and against the recommendations of her own VHs and set them neutral. and after everything else she had done over the past few months we had no choice but to kick her. If she cant be honest about such a small issue, how do we know she is being honest about bigger ones?)
    ella u are my friend as such i will not argue with u about what have been going on inside coallitiona and why in the end rohan were kicked out

    but as u know i strongly dislike lying also when other ppl do it

    and what you write is not true

    coallition was manipulated into declaring on konflict due to one of the members wanted farmland in franconia - i have never backstabed anyone in game yet and as such would not backstab konflict either for phranxure to gain more farms in franconia - and together with my VH we put franconia back to neutral (which mean no attack - no scouting )

    later on we were demanded by coallition to turn them red again - and as i neitehr would or could not do this - as it felt dishonerble - i asked my cohost and VH is they wanted to take over Rohan and as such do what coallition asked of us and set future policy

    but you know what ??? - neither of them though it was right to do that either - so we all 3 together decided to decline coallitions demands to us.

    so nothing was really done behind anyones back - and when we later discussed the future of rohan with the officers all agreed that it was more importent to keep our honor and word to ppl then backstab partners for farmland - so ella where you get your info i really dont know

    maybe this is just the wishfull history done now by coalllition

    we agreed in rohan on NOT declaring - when u gave us an ultimatum. we did this before when coallition told us how to run rohan - unanimously as it is our right (or so we though)

    and yes we knew it might have concequences - but ppl in rohan did think it was worth it - to do the right thing

    it was never me alone making importent decicions concerning the future of rohan or venom - even if it would eb nice seen from coallition side to assume this

    and yes - as u know some of us did join anticoallition side - to fight coallition and you know why ?

    as the coallition and the codex which was the core of it back on 87 and ss29 have changed - it might still be called it coallition here on ss57...... but the old coallition are dead and you are member of the new one who have other ideals then we stared out with

    Quote Originally Posted by ellaranna View Post
    Plus all that coalition ever was is a family. We never even gave ourself the name coaltion, that was done by our reds on the last server. All we ever were was a group of friends that fought together. We didnt want to dominate the server, we never wanted to kill off other alliances, we just wanted to play the game together as allies. If we really are as bad as people seem to think then we would have just killed off everyone on last server. We had the ability and numbers to do so, but that was not what we wanted.
    and yes ella this was our old way - but things changed for soem reason here

    zhay
    Last edited by *zhay; 07-07-2011 at 02:22 PM.
    thanks milly for the sig

  4. #904
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    82 42′0″N, 114 24′0″W - looking for santa
    Posts
    864

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ellaranna View Post
    Not sure exactly when the one from our server was done but Silver didnt have that many cities before merge. We usually sat around the 350 mark. although we may have started collecting cities early for the merge, cause we were all expecting one.
    it have a timestamp on file saying 1dec 2010

    zhay
    thanks milly for the sig

  5. #905
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Lost in Space
    Posts
    570

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by *zhay View Post
    coallition was manipulated into declaring on konflict due to one of the members wanted farmland in franconia - i have never backstabed anyone in game yet and as such would not backstab konflict either for phranxure to gain more farms in franconia - and together with my VH we put franconia back to neutral (which mean no attack - no scouting )

    zhay
    There's always two sides to the story

    That person btw who manipulated coalition to do that should enjoy the game with a permanent lag

    85/ss27/ss56-Attribute<>SemperFi
    92/ss29/ss57-System<>Blyksheep
    138-System>Static
    154-System
    170-Static

  6. #906
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    82 42′0″N, 114 24′0″W - looking for santa
    Posts
    864

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by @strobot View Post

    That person btw who manipulated coalition to do that should enjoy the game with a permanent lag
    thats an evil thing - i would have settled for just removing there alliances from game - and maybe reduce soem ppl to 1 city players

    zhay
    thanks milly for the sig

  7. #907

    Default

    Zhay, you can try and make people believe whatever you want them to, but the fact is you set konflikt neutral without telling us. you cant deny that. Yes we asked you to set them red again, after we found out you had lied. All you had to do was tell us before you put them neutral, instead of putting them neutral and then lying about why people couldnt help Phrax attack them.

    And as far as you stepping down when asked. We didnt do that cause we were trying to control R0HAN, we did it to try and save R0HAN. Your own alliance members asked us to. We dont tell other coaltion alliances how to run thier alliance but when people are coming to us saying they cant handle how you are doing things anymore we did what we thought we had to, to keep your members happy. You yourself did the same thing to Arg back on 87. The main difference is that we took your advise and fixed what we were doing wrong. You on the other hand would only do what you wanted and not what your alliance wanted. You say your decisions were what they wanted but that is not what they said. Those that were supposed to help you make decisions were ignored whenever their opinion was not the same as yours. Causing some to even quit.

    I agree coaltion has changed since it was first started, but my ideals and values have not. I will do anything and everything in my power to help an allie. and thats really all coalition is... allies that want to work together.

  8. #908

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by @strobot View Post
    There's always two sides to the story

    That person btw who manipulated coalition to do that should enjoy the game with a permanent lag
    Yes there are always 2 sides, and maybe Phrax did manipulate us into declaring on Konflikt, but even if they did they dont deserve permanent lag. no one deserves that.

  9. #909
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    82 42′0″N, 114 24′0″W - looking for santa
    Posts
    864

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ellaranna View Post
    Zhay, you can try and make people believe whatever you want them to, but the fact is you set konflikt neutral without telling us. you cant deny that. Yes we asked you to set them red again, after we found out you had lied. All you had to do was tell us before you put them neutral, instead of putting them neutral and then lying about why people couldnt help Phrax attack them.
    ella i never lied about anything - and it was never a secret we put them back on neutral - think it was said too in our joined room

    and when we were asked directly we also told they were neutral .... why should we lie or keep it a secret when we did what we though was right ?

    and for lying about ppl fighting in franconia we never did - we had players there fighting as i also said and they were fighting anything there besides konflict liek we had agreed on with phranxure and konflict in start of our invation there

    you might think it is right to make deals with ppl and they help you - and one day u realize u have to share farms with them - and then start to attack them in an undeclared war

    but i dont do things like that - and to be honest i dont have that much respect for ppl who think and act liek that is ok either

    and i will not do as they do even in the name of the coallition

    Quote Originally Posted by ellaranna View Post
    And as far as you stepping down when asked. We didnt do that cause we were trying to control R0HAN, we did it to try and save R0HAN.
    you know ella i never saw rohan as something which i owned - i was there as long as members wanted me there - and when coallition ask that i did gte some impartial ppl who have alot of respect among teh members to figure out if they wanted a new host - and if so who they would like

    and you know what ....... noone wanted a new host - and most would rather be independed of coallition then see me step down or leave
    so this is actually one of the myth coallition have made - how unhappy ppl are and tehy could not leave rohan

    it might be a nice myth to keep some ppl in coallition happy - but it as alot of other myth really have not hold in reallity and are made by ppl who need it to feel them self justified.
    but maybe you should try talk with soem of teh ppl who was part of rohan - and not just collect information from ppl who we did not wanted in rohan and as such never were invited

    Quote Originally Posted by ellaranna View Post
    You on the other hand would only do what you wanted and not what your alliance wanted. You say your decisions were what they wanted but that is not what they said. Those that were supposed to help you make decisions were ignored whenever their opinion was not the same as yours. Causing some to even quit.
    u know i asked back then who *** they *** were coallition always refere too - but never got a response back - and i dont know how silver is run but in rohan and venom (after lencher left) we did talk about things so tbh i really dont know where u got teh info to this myth about - but if it make you and rest of coallition feel better - then just keep it but it is a myth and as such based on fiction and not facts

    Quote Originally Posted by ellaranna View Post
    I agree coaltion has changed since it was first started, but my ideals and values have not. I will do anything and everything in my power to help an allie. and thats really all coalition is... allies that want to work together.
    coallition have changed - in old days we regareded each other as freinds and as such did what u would do with u normal freinds out in real world and treat them with same respect - now as u say it u self u regard them as ***** allied***** ( the old friend thing fust died or vanish )

    zhay
    Last edited by *zhay; 07-07-2011 at 03:32 PM.
    thanks milly for the sig

  10. #910
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Moravia
    Posts
    288

    Default lol




    Yesterday it was Ella vs me, today Zhay vs Ella.

    like a brazil soap opera

    someone should be selling tickets.
    server: ss57
    alliance: Virtue_230

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •