Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: Age II vs Age I

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    1,082

    Default Age II vs Age I

    Every time a thread is made, people supporting both versions of the game go in and flame the other side (generally Age I people flaming Age II)

    Age I people like to say that Age II is for noobs, but I can't seem to find a reason I would consider valid for this


    Major differences:
    1.) Age I - larger troop upkeep - this requires people to sit around and farm much more to feed their massive armies. I do not believe that farming NPCs makes you pro
    2.) Age II - Facebook - outside of picking up a few cav in the first week, and the resources from allies (also pretty useless after first couple weeks), hunger no more facebook buff is the only important one, lowering your troops upkeep another 50%, in turn reducing your NPC farming requirements more. Yes you can get free ammies too, but that is just nice, not seeing anything noobish there
    3.) HCs - I like this addition. It is something else to fight for and drafting enemies is always a fun way to **** people off. They are also harder to acquire in the first place (than an npc 10) and cannot port, so they are fairly well balanced
    4.) No instant troops - I like this as well. Nothing is more frustrating than whipping another player just to watch him instantly create a new army because his 10 alt accounts that have bots running all day just ship over resources
    5.) Less reason to cheat in age 2 - I am in no means whatsoever saying people don't cheat in age 2, but with queuing troops ALWAYS taking time, having unlimited supplies of resources is less important.
    6.) Hero level cap - without instant troops, there is not need for level 1k+ heroes so that you can make instant troops. Instead of mindlessly grinding a single hero to the highest level possible, you now mindlessly grind a lot of heroes to 100 and 150
    7.) HH - I see the good and bad about these. Something else to make evony a ton of money for sure, and they provide a large advantage to you over those that don't have them. I like them although they make the idea of a server merge very difficult (not that they work amazingly well in age I)
    8.) Colonize only - YES, this is noobish, but was remedied on na20 and above, so I'm not talking about colonize only servers lol


    I'm sure I'm missing a couple other big differences and please, feel free to add

    But of the above, the main differences I see are more upkeep in age 1 as well as making instant troops. Changing neither seems noobish to me.


    If you are going to reply, please make an effort of supporting your argument with reasoning

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    On your shoulder telling you to do things
    Posts
    1,526

    Default

    I think the main reason AgeI call AgeII players noobs, is its not as much as a cut throat game. You dont have to work as hard on you skill level.
    I played Age II once for 15 mins when it was in beta. I didnt like it then, and wont even concider playing it now.
    I have seen people make the jump from age I to age II and never return, but ive seen many more people come running back screaming that their eyes are burning.
    Alot of players belived that AgeII would be an improvement on AgeI insted it became its own game.
    It disapointed alot of AgeI making them less willing to play it.
    Well... Thats kinda my views on it anyway...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    1,082

    Default

    Yeah, if you played in beta I can understand why lol

    With the attack button here now, I see it relatively equal of a cut throat game now


    Oh, and forgot the workshop above in my original post. That is just another evony moneymaker and does kinda suck

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    On your shoulder telling you to do things
    Posts
    1,526

    Default

    The attack button does make a slight diffrence, but still its not, you know, Tries to think of a decent argument... Think about our upkeep, this keeps you playing the game, the larger the army the more need to find food. NPCs only provide so much, So the need to plunder some one on here is alot more appealing, i
    I know one of the reason i walked away was all that blue, Gave me a headache, and the graffics i felt like i was stuck in an 80s arcade.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    TheShadows
    Posts
    152

    Default

    all these gems and whats not is what made me hate age2, its too girly, plus, free playes dont stand a chance in age2 with all these gems and the log list of age2 items.
    i am a hardcore age1 player that rarely spend money, and i kik azz

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    1,082

    Default

    Eh, I played na12 for free and was still powerful, but yeah, spending does help a ton

    And I'm not a fan of the gem system either

    Good points from both of y'all, but still not seeing a huge argument as to why it is for noobs, just why you prefer age I

    (guess the spending being a bigger advatage could be a noob argument )

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    TheShadows
    Posts
    152

    Default

    the farming isn't a plus in age2, i usually have millions of upkeep in my age1 cities, and billions of food. players who don't attack enough in age1 complain about food, aggressive attackers always have plenty. so age2 players that talk about not farming are the noobs of age1 that couldnt keep up

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    On your shoulder telling you to do things
    Posts
    1,526

    Default

    Ive never called ageII noobs really, to me its a weaker version of age I. That might be where the noob name comes from. but like i said before it is a game in its own right, which makes the noob arguement invaild in my eyes
    If youve never played AgeI you wont have the concept of our game play, it is very diffrent.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    in the OT, under Morgan's desk, hiding with CHICK
    Posts
    1,228

    Default

    the one thing that kills age2 in my opinion is the nerf on farming, its just not as convenient anymore while still requiring huge troop counts to take historics etc.... ae2, despite the auto heal etc is much harder to defend on.
    the graphics, gems etc are a bit lame tbh but add some dimension to it too. I loved beta the 10x speed was awefriggin some. If they had a server we were phoenixed on every week and given 10x speed and ammies etc, I'd love to play it again.

    (c) Ravensigs production
    Quote Originally Posted by llCHICKll View Post
    lol, you are worst than ardee... at least she tells you right away to pizz off lol
    Quote Originally Posted by Alusair View Post
    Announcement:
    I will start randomly deleting a post of practicalfool here and there over time to mess with his mind.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    TheShadows
    Posts
    152

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by practicalfool View Post
    the graphics, gems etc are a bit lame tbh but add some dimension to it too. I loved beta the 10x speed was awefriggin some. If they had a server we were phoenixed on every week and given 10x speed and ammies etc, I'd love to play it again.
    gah, the graphics in beta was blinding, not its much better in age2, hated every secnd of it

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •