I think both have their own benefits and detractions.
For games like risk, or others, I have found a much more enjoyable experience when playing with online players as there are preformated rules, that do not leave the more competitive players in dispute of them (some of the people I know are highly competitive... You can argue with people, not so much a machine).
For board games such as chess, I prefer to play it in person (and shogi if I could find a board). It is always nice to beable to talk and play, without typing, and see another persons reaction... Things that are abit hard behind a computer screen (however, with advancements in voice technological programs such as skype, you can still talk while playing a computer game).
There are of course first person shooter computer games. Which, for obvious reasons, are hard to play in real-life with the same perameters. However, my experience with this is very limited, so I cannot comment further then to simply bring up the point.
In truth, however, I do not like the competitive games (and for somereason, I have yet to actually find a board game, save for Majong that is not based on a competitive aspect. Computer games are the same.), and play them in a non-competitve manner. For the sole enjoyment of it. In fact, I play to lose. So my opinion about both may be very biased. Therefore, in the end, I would choose board games. As, provided your opponent is not a die-hard, very serious player, you can have a discussion on other topics, while playing the game.
~John
Last edited by John Adams; 02-24-2011 at 05:38 PM.
To train without ever surpassing ones' limits... Is that truly training?
Bookmarks