Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Smaller Armies........Bad/Good/Neutral

  1. Default Smaller Armies........Bad/Good/Neutral

    This is meant for age1, keep in mind I dont wish for these things to be implimented. But could work with it, and I wouldnt be bent out of shape by it.

    1. What if we had a variable food cost for building troops (im using archers in my examples)
    -The more troops you have of a certain unit the more food it costs to build each one.
    -0-50k cost the base amount of food (300) each
    -50001-100k cost 600 each
    -100001-150k cost 1200 each
    -150001-200k cost 2400 each
    -You can see how it migh get very expensive, to build even a lower class unit such as archers, very quickly
    -So between the higher food price of troops as your armies grow and the upkeep for them you will have a much harder time making the rediculous amounts of troops that people are currently doing.

    2. We could completely throw out the honor system. Link the heal rate directly to your troop #s rather than honor.
    -Lets say you have a total of 100k troops or less, you still get your 50% heal rate.
    -Lets say you have 100001-200k troops, you now have a 40% heal rate
    -By the time you have 500k troops+ you only get a 10% heal rate
    -This may keep people from wanting such large armies, b/c you wont be able to send a couple warrior bombs to rid your honor for your big cav or mech attack.

    3rd You now have 10 slots for holding your valleys per city, we could add another tab where you can have built npcs per cities.
    -If you have a lvl 1 th you can build 1 npc with that city (if the npc is capped then you can build another)
    -If you have a lvl 10 th you can build 10 npcs with that city
    -If you abandon the city you have made npcs with, all those npcs you build get turned back into flats to prevent people from making many lvl 9 ths and 9 nps then abandon for 1 more npc.
    -this will not only help prevent the players who dedicate there lives to farming from farming, but will also help the servers from being swamped with npcs in the later part of the servers.


    If these things happened I feel that it would lower people armies sizes significantly, while still keeping the same ratio of the advantage that people, who spend and/or spend lots of time on here, have.

    And lets face it, being forced to work with fewer #s would create some cool strategies and not let people rely so much on brute force to destroy people. It could give age1 the facelift it needs.

    Post your thoughts.
    Last edited by SkylineR34VSpec; 03-02-2011 at 01:53 PM.
    I have yet to see a burn out that rivals the Skyline
    Heres a video of a bad burnout

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=lB2qsj4Tzm0

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SkylineR34VSpec View Post
    This is meant for age1, keep in mind I dont wish for these things to be implimented. But could work with it, and I wouldnt be bent out of shape by it.

    1. What if we had a variable food cost for building troops (im using archers in my examples)
    -The more troops you have of a certain unit the more food it costs to build each one.
    -0-50k cost the base amount of food (300) each
    -50001-100k cost 600 each
    -100001-150k cost 1200 each
    -150001-200k cost 2400 each
    -You can see how it migh get very expensive, to build even a lower class unit such as archers, very quickly
    -So between the higher food price of troops as your armies grow and the upkeep for them you will have a much harder time making the rediculous amounts of troops that people are currently doing.
    i think this would cause people to farm even MORE, if you are on SS's ive seen people with over 10 bil food per city so this would encourage more farming IMO

    Quote Originally Posted by SkylineR34VSpec View Post
    2. We need could completely throw out the honor system. Link the heal rate directly to your troop #s rather than honor.
    -Lets say you have a total of 100k troops or less, you still get your 50% heal rate.
    -Lets say you have 100001-200k troops, you now have a 40% heal rate
    -By the time you have 500k troops+ you only get a 10% heal rate
    -This may keep people from wanting such large armies, b/c you wont be able to send a couple warrior bombs to rid your honor for your big cav or mech attack.
    this would be interesting, i would like to see how people would play this

    Quote Originally Posted by SkylineR34VSpec View Post
    3rd You now have 10 slots for holding your valleys per city, we need to add another tab where you can have built npcs per cities.
    -If you have a lvl 1 th you can build 1 npc with that city (if the npc is capped then you can build another)
    -If you have a lvl 10 th you can build 10 npcs with that city
    -If you abandon the city you have made npcs with, all those npcs you build get turned back into flats to prevent people from making many lvl 9 ths and 9 nps then abandon for 1 more npc.
    -this will not only help prevent the players who dedicate there lives to farming from farming, but will also help the servers from being swamped with npcs in the later part of the servers.


    If these things happened I feel that it would lower people armies sizes significantly, while still keeping the same ratio of the advantage that people, who spend and/or spend lots of time on here, have.

    Post your thoughts.
    imo this would cause even more alt accounts to make npcs for the main accounts

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Rotorua,New Zealand
    Posts
    24

    Default

    its is true the commet said above me people would make MORE alts when 75percent of most ss are alts or inactive any way
    i like lvl1 npc's :P

  4. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by None4You View Post
    i think this would cause people to farm even MORE, if you are on SS's ive seen people with over 10 bil food per city so this would encourage more farming IMO
    With a variable food cost, once you reach a certain point you honestly could not build any troops...................I cant see people trying to build troops past the point when it costs 1m food for a archer, for example. So farming your life away would only help till you hit that point. But my idea wasnt to get people to stop farming so much, just to lower army sizes while keeping the advantage farmers and spenders had, at the same ratio. In this idea I feel the advantage is still intact.


    Quote Originally Posted by None4You View Post
    imo this would cause even more alt accounts to make npcs for the main accounts
    Didnt think of that...................If evony actually enforced their rules, alt accounts would not exist, or at least not be sooooo ungodfuly common.
    But this idea would also take away the advantage, people who farm alot have................so maybe i scratch this idea...............Well maybe not, the people who farm alot typically have many cities...........so if they have many cities then they get to build more npcs than people who dont have many cities. so there is still an advantage but i dont feel the advantage ratio is the same i feel with this idea the advantage ratio is cut nearly in half.

    Just thinking while i type on this post.
    Last edited by SkylineR34VSpec; 03-02-2011 at 01:52 PM.
    I have yet to see a burn out that rivals the Skyline
    Heres a video of a bad burnout

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=lB2qsj4Tzm0

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SkylineR34VSpec View Post
    This is meant for age1, keep in mind I dont wish for these things to be implimented. But could work with it, and I wouldnt be bent out of shape by it.

    2. We need could completely throw out the honor system. Link the heal rate directly to your troop #s rather than honor.
    -Lets say you have a total of 100k troops or less, you still get your 50% heal rate.
    -Lets say you have 100001-200k troops, you now have a 40% heal rate
    -By the time you have 500k troops+ you only get a 10% heal rate
    -This may keep people from wanting such large armies, b/c you wont be able to send a couple warrior bombs to rid your honor for your big cav or mech attack.
    This would favor people with Instant heroes way too much, the more instant the better. The huge coiners would gain an other huge advantage.

    The other ideas, way to complicated imho.

  6. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Entoverse View Post
    This would favor people with Instant heroes way too much, the more instant the better. The huge coiners would gain an other huge advantage.

    The other ideas, way to complicated imho.
    I dont see where this would favor people with instant heros............pls elaborate............well i could see where they could keep smaller amounts of troops (for the better heal rate) for defences...........and larger amount of troops on attacks, i guess that could help them a bit...........but honestly it wouldnt give them much more of an advantage than they already have. and with the smaller army sizes 50% of 1 mil is way smaller than 50% of 5mil


    They could be done, ive seen many games with variable costs for things............and to limit each city on building npcs wouldnt be that complicated either.
    Last edited by SkylineR34VSpec; 03-02-2011 at 01:59 PM.
    I have yet to see a burn out that rivals the Skyline
    Heres a video of a bad burnout

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=lB2qsj4Tzm0

  7. #7

    Default

    Small armies I like big armies, I also like no troop upkeep, but how to make it a practical business decision for evony. How about putting a category in the store for 1k hours of no troop upkeep for 50 coin. ($4 a month) Low enough to sell in volume month to month. This would be revenue for evony and sanity for those that spend hours a day just farming. They could make it so that Qing up troops would cost double recourses while in no upkeep status so their would be still need to be some farming for initial troop production, medals, hero xp, etc. but a lot less intensive. And less need for a BOT company to run a second account because they use the BOTs basicly for food gathering to support their current troops. People would still need to be online multiple times daily to run defenses, Q troops, and coordinate with alliance to attack. Rather than going on-line and take 20 - 30 minutes sending out farm units, then sign off because of other things to do and not have time to play war. I'm getting burned out playing farmvillevony. People would now be able to buy teleports and teleport to an enemy rather than stay in one spot because that is where all your farming area is and you need to feed your army rather then play war. As for big armies, everyone would have big armies, and they can be broke also. I was off-line for 6-7 hours recently and lost a city with a large hero and nearly 3 million men under the current rules, so it can be done. Farmvillevony

  8. #8

    Default

    how about all the noobs stop making stupid alternatives to the game. get over the fact that we have larger armies. and if evony actually did this plan they would lose 90% of the players. so f that.
    im better than you

  9. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mickeymous View Post
    Small armies I like big armies, I also like no troop upkeep, but how to make it a practical business decision for evony. How about putting a category in the store for 1k hours of no troop upkeep for 50 coin. ($4 a month) Low enough to sell in volume month to month. This would be revenue for evony and sanity for those that spend hours a day just farming. They could make it so that Qing up troops would cost double recourses while in no upkeep status so their would be still need to be some farming for initial troop production, medals, hero xp, etc. but a lot less intensive. And less need for a BOT company to run a second account because they use the BOTs basicly for food gathering to support their current troops. People would still need to be online multiple times daily to run defenses, Q troops, and coordinate with alliance to attack. Rather than going on-line and take 20 - 30 minutes sending out farm units, then sign off because of other things to do and not have time to play war. I'm getting burned out playing farmvillevony. People would now be able to buy teleports and teleport to an enemy rather than stay in one spot because that is where all your farming area is and you need to feed your army rather then play war. As for big armies, everyone would have big armies, and they can be broke also. I was off-line for 6-7 hours recently and lost a city with a large hero and nearly 3 million men under the current rules, so it can be done. Farmvillevony
    UHHH............not sure why you posted this in this thread lol, this sounds like a game suggestion and it looks like it will increase army sized EXPINENTIALY!

    But ill put my thoughts in on it.
    41.6 days of no upkeep for 50 cents? that sounds like basically a free give away. it should be more like 24 hrs of no upkeep for 50 cents.

    Let me ask you a question................why do you like BIG armies so much......................you can do the same amount of damage with less troops if you know how to use them. " As for big armies, everyone would have big armies, and they can be broke also." quoting you here, it would seem that you think im complaining about big armies...................no im just seeing on how people felt about using smaller armies. I am one to have a decent to large army as well. everyone has one so i will too. anyway enough rambling................just why do you like big armies so much?



    Quote Originally Posted by Choz View Post
    how about all the noobs stop making stupid alternatives to the game. get over the fact that we have larger armies. and if evony actually did this plan they would lose 90% of the players. so f that.
    You are entitled to your opinion about how the game should be. But why all the hostility here....and why are you suggestiong that im complaining about people and big armies, i myself am host to a large army, and i doubt you have had a larger one than me all im asking in the thread is why you feel the way you do about army sizes and all you did was talk sht. so just tell us why you think evony would lose 90% of players and explain why you think its a bad thing
    Last edited by SkylineR34VSpec; 03-02-2011 at 06:09 PM.
    I have yet to see a burn out that rivals the Skyline
    Heres a video of a bad burnout

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=lB2qsj4Tzm0

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    The P-Town Pittsboro
    Posts
    2,347

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SkylineR34VSpec View Post
    This is meant for age1, keep in mind I dont wish for these things to be implimented. But could work with it, and I wouldnt be bent out of shape by it.

    1. What if we had a variable food cost for building troops (im using archers in my examples)
    -The more troops you have of a certain unit the more food it costs to build each one.
    -0-50k cost the base amount of food (300) each
    -50001-100k cost 600 each
    -100001-150k cost 1200 each
    -150001-200k cost 2400 each
    -You can see how it migh get very expensive, to build even a lower class unit such as archers, very quickly
    -So between the higher food price of troops as your armies grow and the upkeep for them you will have a much harder time making the rediculous amounts of troops that people are currently doing.

    2. We could completely throw out the honor system. Link the heal rate directly to your troop #s rather than honor.
    -Lets say you have a total of 100k troops or less, you still get your 50% heal rate.
    -Lets say you have 100001-200k troops, you now have a 40% heal rate
    -By the time you have 500k troops+ you only get a 10% heal rate
    -This may keep people from wanting such large armies, b/c you wont be able to send a couple warrior bombs to rid your honor for your big cav or mech attack.

    3rd You now have 10 slots for holding your valleys per city, we could add another tab where you can have built npcs per cities.
    -If you have a lvl 1 th you can build 1 npc with that city (if the npc is capped then you can build another)
    -If you have a lvl 10 th you can build 10 npcs with that city
    -If you abandon the city you have made npcs with, all those npcs you build get turned back into flats to prevent people from making many lvl 9 ths and 9 nps then abandon for 1 more npc.
    -this will not only help prevent the players who dedicate there lives to farming from farming, but will also help the servers from being swamped with npcs in the later part of the servers.


    If these things happened I feel that it would lower people armies sizes significantly, while still keeping the same ratio of the advantage that people, who spend and/or spend lots of time on here, have.

    And lets face it, being forced to work with fewer #s would create some cool strategies and not let people rely so much on brute force to destroy people. It could give age1 the facelift it needs.

    Post your thoughts.
    500k is not a lot. More about 1mil-10mil would be some where average.

    Quote Originally Posted by Awesomeness5577 View Post
    Why do you have to roll DM?
    Quote Originally Posted by Mati2 View Post
    He's a big guy, okay?
    Quote Originally Posted by Hehe View Post
    Wow, forgot how crazy DoubleM was.
    Quote Originally Posted by Arathorn136 View Post
    Well I've been so ridiculously bored lately, but I haven't knifed anybody up yet.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •