Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: Server Split Instead of a Server merge (for a change)

  1. #1

    Default Server Split Instead of a Server merge (for a change)

    I would suggest a server splitting up rather than merging all the conjested server into one so call super server.

    How to go about it is simple:

    1. All alliance of the even numbers,eg ranking no.2,4,6 etc etc goes to one server.The rest of no.1,3,5,7 etc goes to another server.

    2. No new registeration of new accts for 30 days.

    3. Free upkeep for 7 days.

    4. Apply every advantage/rule of a server merge to a server split.

    Advantage:

    1. Ease the super crowded super server lag.

    2. Brings back player who quit the game.

    3. More farming space.

    4. Need not remove inactive accounts,since evony dont shows much intention to.

    5. Allowing new players to come in to play as well.

    6. Save on starting a new server whereby most who register on new server are old players.

    7. Evony gets to do what the players dislike most,eg. Releasing the botters, removing of npcs,have 1 hour of server maintainance etc etc.

    I strongly believe this would be a better move rather than crowding 16 servers into 1 which cause extreme lagging and at times even a crash.And i believe server will gets more actives with more war as everyone will be spread all over the map & each trying to via over certain state.New alliance can be created.

    Its win win situation there...

    Do u think thats a better idea than a server merge? Thoughts?
    Last edited by StormRidersss; 04-01-2011 at 08:37 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Out of my mind; back in five
    Posts
    1,677

    Default

    Its win win situation there...

    Do u think thats a better idea than a server merge? Thoughts?
    Bad Idea. Half a server? Our server is pretty empty & dead already, split m and there's no action left...
    Last edited by The Luda; 04-01-2011 at 08:45 AM.



    A new study shows licking a frog can cure depression.
    Down side is, soon as you stop, the frog get depressed again.

    >.<

    <3

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Luda View Post
    Bad Idea. Half a server? Our server is pretty empty & dead already, split m and there's no action left...
    how do u define a dead server? sorry to ask...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    WV, USA
    Posts
    404

    Default

    Before quitting ss60, I was friendly with another alliance that had been my friendly since server 78 (that's 3 merges worth of history). We were friends, we were true allies. If Evony split us because we were an even number and they were an odd number, I'd be pretty freaking angry.

  5. Default

    This idea seems like a mess for me. Evony merges servers so that they need less of them to maintain. Adding more would just jack up their costs quickly. It would also, as said above, kill servers even more. So basically, Evony is buying servers their players won't even want to play on.

    Then there will be those that complain, and they will say they want to get moved to a certain server because that's where their friend is going to go. And also, what about normal players without an alliance? Would just make too many disputes and arguments I think.

    Overall, this idea is interesting, but has some large flaws.

    Week 9 voting and Week 10 entries.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rota View Post
    I'm not sure if there was a counterpoint in there. But, if it will make you happy, then I yield the dispute to put an end to this tangent. You win.
    I won!
    Enter the Void - My Video Gaming Forum

  6. #6

    Default

    instead of taking the players by alliance's even or odd numbers,i believe it can also be arrange for players to chose which server to go to,since there used to be an option for us to go to either Age I or Age II...

    Evony is still buying server to start brand new,eg. S150 & S151...was thinking since they start anew & it's mainly old players playing on new server,why not have new server for players to split up...a chance for all bigger players to grow even bigger & smaller players to grow big...

    Example,if a server only has 100 player & max limit is 1000 player before lag starts.When it reach its 1000 limit,split them into 2,so server wont weigh too heavy.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    In your Dreams Turning them Into Nightmares
    Posts
    45

    Default

    With 20k people playing a server there is still barely any lag.. Why make them spend more money so they cant add as many features and introduce new stuff instead of just dealing with a split second more time to go from your town to your map...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    I live in Cali/ UL is our home state
    Posts
    3

    Default

    what if they just put everyone together on one server then wait untill there is only one alliance left then open another server and do the same?
    Long Live MASONS

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Where ever my random ports land
    Posts
    516

    Default

    if you split then there would be 1/2 the reds to fight therefore making more people complain, most want bigger wars and closer reds than bigger farming grounds!

    well i do anyways! ;D
    http://tinypic.com/r/15ydsf4/7

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Hacking the Gibson
    Posts
    179

    Default

    April fools post?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •