Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 33

Thread: Age1 vs Age2

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    I live on 155, closer than you think
    Posts
    1,443

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BigNorr View Post
    I played for an hour said screw this and left lol
    I played for about 3 weeks. I hate fb stuff. I liked a lot about age2 but I just can't stand how much u need fb to keep up with the people who abuse it. Also I didn't like the graphics. I wish there were 2 types of attacks one for colonizing and one just to attack and plunder.

    So if fb was eliminated, graphics were redone, and regular attacks were thrown in, I could really get into it.
    Quote Originally Posted by acer5200 View Post
    And yes, I'm a beautiful pink princessFeel free to quote me on that like I know you will.
    Quote Originally Posted by teatotal View Post
    you should always believe me im a man and as a man i can not lie its actualy impossible ....

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Check WR..... You cant miss me :D
    Posts
    769

    Default

    im an age2 player and i love it tried age1 but couldnt get into it there are pros and cons of both but when it comes to play style they are 2 totally different games age2 players dont know wat its like to insta pult or insta anything for that matter we cant just work on 1 hero till we get bored get 1 to 100 and then move on to another but in my opinion i dont think they could make a game style to keep both age 1 and age2 players interested in it it would be one or the other

    EPIC sigs done by Morgan La Fey
    Na28 (ReBirth) (before they retired) HHx2 3100
    S158 (died)
    why test on animals when we have prisons full of pedophiles
    "Yea fool keep hatin, at least i know im doing something right."

  3. #13

    Default

    Dont even compare facebook and age 1


    My haters are my motivators
    RETIRED

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Few steps behind Acer
    Posts
    326

    Default

    Age 1 simple in graphics and works, age 2 sparkly and "stuff" lags to hell, age one has always been my fave since the beta of age 2, but yeh there are some good things over there like the refuge camp, extended market buying, buildings looking different each lvl, lower food drain but all in all at the end of the day too "sparkly" for my liking
    Quod nos non interficit, nos fortiores facitrnrn

    (\__/)
    (='.'=)This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
    (")_(")signature to help him gain world domination.

  5. #15

    Default

    Sad to say, I have to agree that the average Age II player just doesnt take the time to learn the gameplay mechanics, so an average Age 1 player would whoop the A** of the average Age II player. On the other end of the spectrum though, there are quite a few people who do take the time to learn the gameplay mechanics, and do excel because they put that time and energy into playing the game well. I think these types of players would do well in either Age, because they would be able to adapt and learn just the same, if of course they took the time to learn and adapt.

    With Age II vs Age I, I play Age II because that is the Age the friend who introduced me to evony was playing at that time. I liked the aspect of teamwork, and historical cities, and loved being in the alliance I got into, so I stuck with it. Alot of importance is given to teamwork to capture historical cities from the computer as well as from players because of the larger proportion of troops kept in them. Historical cities themselves are a fun NPC to compete over, more so for the bragging rights than the benefits you gain from having them. The main thing that historical cities are used for more often than not is to capture other Historical cities, especially the higher tier ones. The colonization aspect in my opinion isnt too great, and Id rather live without it (in most of the newer Age II servers, there are both the attack and colonization buttons, I tend to just ignore the colonize button lol).

    Age I, I havent really had a chance to really play it, but my preemptive impressions about it are that its alot more PvP competitive than Age II, but alot more individual skill-based because of that. With the added aspect of refuge, alot more importance is given to the time you put into the game, so time will reflect more than cash comparatively. The lack of a level cap on heros also means that theres a bigger benefit to farming constantly. Instant heros, and faster troop times in general means that rebuilding is much quicker and the only limiter is how many resources you can accumulate, farm, or buy.
    NA24: CELTS - Retired
    NA33: INSOMNIA - Retired
    NA43: Relapse

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    303

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hollandrock View Post
    would say Age I'ers would have a slight advantage in that there is more PvP involved - They would be able to fight at a pace the Age II players most likely wouldn't be able to deal with
    Heroes move twice as fast in age 2 due to mount. The pace is twice as fast in age 2

  7. #17

    Default

    I don't like hero gear or colonization or no refuge/zero food consumption or the graphics. But after playing Age II, Age I just feels like it's missing something now. It's like the worst of both worlds.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Look at that tree, to your left.. Bit more... Down a little bit.. Yeah, found me.
    Posts
    990

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Domi View Post
    Heroes move twice as fast in age 2 due to mount. The pace is twice as fast in age 2
    I was meaning in a general war sense ... eg. the quickly porting cities out and smashing into enemies, then moving straight on to the next target while continuing to farm and build up in other cities...
    Server 133 (SS62)

    Find me if you dare!

    http://i1127.photobucket.com/albums/l633/ImGimp/Wabbits_com.png
    Amazing sig - Morgon le Fay!

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    303

    Default

    I Dont see why there would be a difference on that part in age 2 compared to age 1

    From my experience, it is not

  10. #20
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Check WR..... You cant miss me :D
    Posts
    769

    Default

    I do agree that most age2 players don't take the time to learn battle mechanics but there are things about age2 age1 players hate and vise versa I'd like the no hero lvl cap on age2 but let's face it age2 servers aren't meant to stay active that long to lvl a hero hella

    And age1 players don't like that there are no insta anything on age 2 due to the hero lvl cap so u can't farm for a year to get an insta pult hero your lowest troop time with all gear lvl 10 and a 15 star set all around is about 8 min 45 second a pult and that's the best u can do

    EPIC sigs done by Morgan La Fey
    Na28 (ReBirth) (before they retired) HHx2 3100
    S158 (died)
    why test on animals when we have prisons full of pedophiles
    "Yea fool keep hatin, at least i know im doing something right."

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •