Paradox theories

[King Alboin]

the inevitablility of predeterminations can not be held up to be so, if random quarks can be applied to the Slot.

It is an illusion that matter looks solid to us. Yet matter acts quirky the smaller one digresses into its base parts.

If the universe were a contained universe, and has no adjoining universes, linked on the fringes of space, then perhaps Slot makes perfect sense, I agree.

Yet trons and even gravity on the quantum level acts as if there is more than just this universe that we know and have grown fond of. Other universes with a complete different set of laws, governing their matter or what have you on a variable slide of differentiality.

Time is an illusion, just like matter is. So I would tend then towards Dlot instead of Slot, though I am not so sure that the rules of Slot can be written in stone, then I would suggest that time travel is possible, with out the concurrent haphazardness of changin the future line from which one has come from, then that would mean that the time traveler can not actually go back to their original future, but to a slightly off parallel line that was created the moment they went back into the past.

So in theory, Loveboy's Plot is altered, from his original Plot, angling off just so slightly, almost seemingly parallel, but not. Yet whoah to that idea, for now instead of having 6 billion lives +/- existing in all of existance, there are now 12 billion lives +/- existing in all of existance, and so on exponentially.

a fractal gone amuck, visually that is.

In restrospect Alusair, take the watch again.

If as stated Loveboy went back in time, using his mind, instead of some invented time machine, linking himself with the past..

as stated in the original, he went back in the past to a point that was after the time the watch was made. So the two watches exist, at the same time, in the same universe, the moment he stepped in.

assuming that the original watch he bought was the original watch that was made, when he stepped back in time, there is then W1 and W1, the same. you can study the double slit experiment ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment

for reasonings as to see how it is possible for a an electron to split its essence equally, thereby theoretically confirming that there could be two watches that are the same exact watch.

call it the "pair of clocks" theorum, I suppose if you want to give it a name

now you state then that at that moment, this is in fact a paradox, but no implosions, well maybe not, but maybe so, can not really find out till it is actually done. urrrgh

and all that aside, just to follow the two W1's

W1 the one still on its original Plot, goes through its time, and ends up at the antique store.

somewhere along its path on its Plot, it shows up again, yet it is more aged than itself because it has been down its Plot a lot longer than than the one that is on its original Plot path.

the older looking one gets sold to a pawnbroker, so now it is now on its own Plot path.

There are now, two watches, on the same time line, be it Dlot or Slot or DKot.

lets assume the younger watch ends up at the antique store, and is the one purchased by Loverboy, but see, some where in this universe is the older watch singing along just nicely along its second path.

So at the time that Loverboy originally purchased W1 the younger, W1 the elder exist, prolly in the back in the vault of the antique dealers office.

Now should Loverboy had bought W1 the elder, then a never ending loop begins, always going to repeat itself, even though we travell onward through the line of time, that darn watch will be stuck in a quantum loop of "here we go again" yet one of the watches still would have to continue its personal time line, because both watches would exist at time of purchase not matter which watch was bought.

The idea is called the "bootstrap paradox"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bootstrap_paradox

and I got the idea from the movie "somewhere in time" with jane seymore and christopher reeves, but I apply a twist, as to the known origin of the watch, separate from the loop discribed in the "bootstrap paraclendium" {yeah made up word, but it fits}

to support your premise Alusair there is this russian dude who says that if something would change the past it would be impossible so the chances of changing the past are zero. k I dont 'splain it well but here is the link that does ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novikov_self-consistency_principle